Jump to content

Rescue your mate?


Dan

What would you do?  

26 members have voted

  1. 1. You are working with a mate doing some drainage, your mate is down a man hole about 6' deep. You look and see that hes in a heap at the bottom it looks likes he's fallen but he's not responding to your shouts, what would you do?

    • Go down and carry him out
      5
    • Call for help
      21


Recommended Posts

My two cents..

 

Six feet is shallow enough to hold your breath long enough to access the situation. Having been confined space trained in the UK. The O2 level needs to be around 21%. It becomes hazardous at 19.5%. You will get ringing in the ears, shortness of breath and other symptoms before you lose conciousness. Various gases to worry about like C02 and Nitrogen. Both, if memory serves, displace oxygen so just sticking your head in the hole can cause you to lose conciousness.

 

The training stated that if there was ever an incident where there was someone in the space that needed assistance you were to call but this is one of those judgment calls I think.

 

I know where this is leading. Had the circumstances been a bit different (the hole deeper, combustable gases that could be detected by smell) I would have called first.

I don't think its the lack of O2 thats the suggested problem more the prescence of H2S (hydrogen sulphide which has an LC50 level of 800ppm for 5 minutes exposure but can cause pulmonary edema and possible death at rates as low as 320ppm) we had a guy exposed to H2S by just opening an inspection cover and looking inside once and it made him very ill indeed. mind you if your working in that sort of environment gas detectors (most personnel gas alarms pick up H2S at concentrations of around 10-20ppm i believe)and compressed air self rescue kits used to be the order of the day when i did it, things may have changed now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 36
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i would nip into my local canaries´r ús store.grab a little yellow bassard and fling him down the pit to see if he snuffed it :lol:

 

 

I'll give that two :bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163:

 

Did you see del and rodney episode when they thought they had killed densils wife's canary, can't think of her name.. Priceless.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'll give that two :bigemo_harabe_net-163::bigemo_harabe_net-163:

 

Did you see del and rodney episode when they thought they had killed densils wife's canary, can't think of her name.. Priceless.

 

agreed barry, brilliant stuff......shame they´re not making the programs any more. :schmoll:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think its the lack of O2 thats the suggested problem more the prescence of H2S (hydrogen sulphide which has an LC50 level of 800ppm for 5 minutes exposure but can cause pulmonary edema and possible death at rates as low as 320ppm) we had a guy exposed to H2S by just opening an inspection cover and looking inside once and it made him very ill indeed. mind you if your working in that sort of environment gas detectors (most personnel gas alarms pick up H2S at concentrations of around 10-20ppm i believe)and compressed air self rescue kits used to be the order of the day when i did it, things may have changed now.

 

 

You are correct Snakey I didn't mean to leave out the LELs. Standards haven't changed. If anything they have improved. The alarms are smaller and most do multiple gases to include LELs. They also alarm for length of exposure- say for X hours at X ppm. FWIW in this poll, the 'mate' shouldn't have been left alone in the first place which is why you have that person at the top and your harness always attached to the tripod.

 

This poll, I think, was meant to see how many people would disregard the rules and not knowing what those rules are, most people (I suspect) would have rushed in without thinking about it. Personally, I would have broken the 'rules' regardless based on the risk as assessed at the time and understanding those 'rules'. Thankfully I don't do that sort of work any longer.

 

added: Assuming this as applied to the Volunteer hero that saved the girl at the cliff, I would also think he was fully aware of the risk involved during his assessment.

Edited by Jeff S

Jeff

 

Piscator non solum piscatur.

 

Yellow Prowler13

2274389822_1033c38a0e_s.jpg

Ask me at 75...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You are correct Snakey I didn't mean to leave out the LELs. Standards haven't changed. If anything they have improved. The alarms are smaller and most do multiple gases to include LELs. They also alarm for length of exposure- say for X hours at X ppm. FWIW in this poll, the 'mate' shouldn't have been left alone in the first place which is why you have that person at the top and your harness always attached to the tripod.

 

This poll, I think, was meant to see how many people would disregard the rules and not knowing what those rules are, most people (I suspect) would have rushed in without thinking about it. Personally, I would have broken the 'rules' regardless based on the risk as assessed at the time and understanding those 'rules'. Thankfully I don't do that sort of work any longer.

 

added: Assuming this as applied to the Volunteer hero that saved the girl at the cliff, I would also think he was fully aware of the risk involved during his assessment.

 

 

Yep indeed! and to show how easy it can be to be a dead hero, remember if it was a DIY job, its likely that no one would have any PPE, let alone alarms.

 

As for the Coastguard weve got no idea if he even made an assessment, but as the MCA said, he hasnt been told off ............!

There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot!

 

Its nice here! http://www.twfcorfu.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep indeed! and to show how easy it can be to be a dead hero, remember if it was a DIY job, its likely that no one would have any PPE, let alone alarms.

 

As for the Coastguard weve got no idea if he even made an assessment, but as the MCA said, he hasnt been told off ............!

 

There is major difference between the two situation, people involved with entering chambers and other various vessels would or should be well adversed with well planned procedures and safety manuals and be professionally employed.

 

Where as the coastguard situation is manned by volunteers, not saying they are poorly trained but the environment is very different added to which every call out will be in an unquantified situation.

 

Sewage,waste and petro-chem plant employees know the area they work in and again should be fully conversant with all aspects of that area and have all the required equipment to hand. Having said that if your inside a plant and the cracker unit goes up I very much doubt you will have the opportunity to kiss your butt good bye before you take of in a fiery ball :D:lol: Always said the main requirement for working in such environments was a good sense of humour. :D

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I disagree Ken, the Coast Guard are volunteers (like the RNLI), they are both well trained and experts in their fields, plus I had a DIY situation in mind, ie people not being familair with working in confined spaces, which the poll bears out.

 

I do agree that people doing it professionally should know what they are doing.

 

The other thing I have been saying is that its easy to make assumptions from news articles only telling the half of a story that sells papers!! Equally making assumptions from a Poll that doesnt give much detail!!

 

Dan

Edited by Dan

There's a fine line between fishing and standing on the shore like an idiot!

 

Its nice here! http://www.twfcorfu.com

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I disagree Ken, the Coast Guard are volunteers (like the RNLI), they are both well trained and experts in their fields, plus I had a DIY situation in mind, ie people not being familair with working in confined spaces, which the poll bears out.

 

I do agree that people doing it professionally should know what they are doing.

 

The other thing I have been saying is that its easy to make assumptions from news articles only telling the half of a story that sells papers!! Equally making assumptions from a Poll that doesnt give much detail!!

 

Dan

 

80% got it right which can't be bad as I doubt many would consider themselves fully trained in that field. Mind you I have always felt despite all the evidence that the angling fraternity have very logical minds filled with lots of fairly useless information :D Bet if that went on a general chat forum composed of non-anglers the percentage would be nearer 50/50 :lol::lol:

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.