The trouble with Sea Angler is that the fishing reports are so old because of the nature of the publication, that they really are almost worthless reading. And the "Hot-spot" sections are just a re-hash of the corresponding month for the previous year and the year before that....... Also, they have to play up the catches, simply because they have to. They're hardly going to say; "It's no good going fishing, because there is nothing being caught" It's hardly going to induce anybody to rush out and buy their magazine, is it?
As for the equipment tests that they do, these are hardly unbiased if they are testing for example a Penn product and half the magazine consists of Penn advertising. This applies to many other makes as well. If I was a manafacturer, I don't think I would renew my advert if I read that Sea Angler were slating my product in the very same publication that I had paid thousands of pounds for advertising!
The magazine seems to have taken a very big dip in circulation in recent years. I never see it on the shelves of mainstream newsagents like WH Smiths or the like anymore.
I once emailed Mel Russ and and dared to "criticise." I received a very curt reply, bordering on the rude! I have since desisted criricising and also stopped buying the magazine. At the end of the day it's personal choice.