Jump to content

global warming?


barry luxton

Recommended Posts

Except our skint government giving 500 million to Syria.

That's another topic altogether. I'm guessing you don't like the idea of helping refugees

 

Why are the world and his wife focusing on the negative aspects of climate change surely there are positives .

Alas, the downside is likely to outweigh any local benefits

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why are the world and his wife focusing on the negative aspects of climate change surely there are positives .

yup as phone pointed out global warming gave us the north sea :)

 

http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/forums/index.php?/topic/5175492-other-concerns-than-climate/&do=findComment&comment=6159338

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's another topic altogether. I'm guessing you don't like the idea of helping refugees

Not really when this country is allegedly on its arse the powers that be seem to find money to chuck away

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really when this country is allegedly on its arse the powers that be seem to find money to chuck away

I'm sure the suffering of the world would take comfort from your humanity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All, UK'ers

 

Just so you'll know where your money is going in Syria. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/245283/DFID-Syria-Humanitarian-Programme-Summary.pdf

 

Rob,

 

I tend to agree. I'm sure some of the science is factual. "We have to save our children and and future generations from this crisis". Who is "we" and what "crisis". I'm having a hard time with any moral crisis since I'm going to drive and I'm going to eat meat.

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The paper:

""""D. Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes

Understanding recent changes in the climate system results from combining observations, studies of feedback processes, and model simulations. Evaluation of the ability of climate models tosimulate recent changes requires consideration of the state of all modelled climate system components at the start of the simulation and the natural and anthropogenic forcing used to drive the models. """""

 

First impression of the paper: (by Phone)

Institutions (governments, etc.) are the multitude of means for holding society together, for giving it a sense of purpose and for enabling it to adapt. Institutions "act on" help to define climate change both as a problem and a context, through such socialised devices as the use of scientific knowledge, culturally defined interpretation of scientific findings, and politically tolerable adaptation strategies. The paper, IMO, is neither fish nor fowl (mostly sociology of "moral crisis"). It is muddled. Certainly doesn't discuss with any depth "tolerable adaptation strategies" and the"socialised devices" are such broad parameter compolations that they don't meet any "culturally defined interpretation" of a "scientific finding" when averaged together.

 

 

Phone

Edit: What would you say the difference between this report and all the UFOlogosts getting together to define exactly what a little green man would look like in 2050?

Edited by Phone
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm sure the suffering of the world would take comfort from your humanity.

Ha Humanity a misnomer if ever I heard one, my charitable acts are a lot closer to home than Syria

  • Like 2

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.