Jump to content

Budget day

big_cod

By big_cod
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

...and Big Cod you know Jack ... about VAT and the end user.

The end user is not quoted a RRP + Vat./ Its an end price. I know if i can afford a product and decide to purchase or not.
VAT does not come into the equation. If VAT was cut back to 15% you would not notice. Same as when the % was raised to 20.
It's the end user price i address and have no interest in the middle bits, Raw material cost, wages, VAT etc.
Except the deficit would be larger and the options to fix are running out.
Stop and think for a moment, please.

So lets put vat up to 30% then for hooks sake it would solve all our economic woos or better claim the billions the big corporations are fiddleing through the back door we could start by raiseing the top levell of tax back to 50% to start the ball rolling to reduce the deficit but no that hurts the most wealthy in our society we dont want to hurt them but we will punish the least well off the disabled the bedroom tax is very clear example just like the poll tax but on a smaller scale the least well of in our society get kicked in the bualls just when they done need it but who cares.

paul.

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 91
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

n4lly
n4lly

...and Big Cod you know Jack ... about VAT and the end user.   The end user is not quoted a RRP + Vat./ Its an end price. I know if i can afford a product and decide to purchase or not. VAT does no

chesters1
chesters1

A chelsea tractor is an inappropriate 4x4 half the school run is now 4x4 cars ,its not because of snow or even off roading home its 'i can afford this but i dont need it ,i can afford the extra tax an

big_cod
big_cod

o k I,ll change the words for you, can you remove the words punch line from my post, in it's place put in 'relevance of your link', Thanks in anticipation.     As for the pub trade, your right

Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted (edited)

And you think that he did it personally?

He woke up one morning with an idea?

Or maybe Maggie told him to do it

 

His department referred it to the Monopolies commission.

The Monopolies Commission, which was an independent body formed under a Labour Government BTW decided that there was a problem and took action.

Nothing to do with Maggie then.

 

You are so busy looking for Tory bogeymen hiding behind every tree and so desperate to blame them for everything whether they are involved or not, you seem to be losing your grip on reality.

They are politicians

They are all the same

There will be no revolution

Get over it.

Edited by Sportsman

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

 

And you think that he did it personally?

He woke up one morning with an idea?

Or maybe Maggie told him to do it

 

His department referred it to the Monopolies commission.

The Monopolies Commission, which was an independent body formed under a Labour Government BTW decided that there was a problem and took action.

Nothing to do with Maggie then.

 

You are so busy looking for Tory bogeymen hiding behind every tree and so desperate to blame them for everything whether they are involved or not, you seem to be losing your grip on reality.

They are politicians

They are all the same

There will be no revolution

Get over it.

 

SO WHO WAS IT !.

 

If my noble friend is minded to implement the recommendation on the 2,000 pub limit, let us consider what will happen. The industry has only two choices. It can keep its pubs and sell its breweries, or it can put 22,000 pubs on the market at a stroke. American, Japanese and Australian brewers are waiting in the wings to buy up this country's brewing capacity. They understand about 1429 monopolies. In Australia one brewer has 98 per cent. of the home market. I do not believe that noble Lords are opposed to foreign ownership as such, if brought about by natural market forces. However, what I find quite unacceptable is that a Conservative Government should propose the dissolution of the brewers' estates and bring it about by regulation and interference.

 

http://hansard.millbanksystems.com/lords/1989/jun/14/brewing-industry-mmc-recommendations

 

YES IT WAS A CONSERVATIVE GOVERMENT AND PROBABLY MAGGYS IDEA AS WELL .

 

GET OVER IT !

 

AND GET A GRIP ON REALITY !

 

paul.

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
n4lly Member

n4lly

Posted
Posted

"start by raising the top level of tax back to 50% to start the ball rolling to reduce the deferceite"

 

I could edit the spelling ,however, Tony blair said "**** that, an an increase will cost me an cherie, MILLIONS"

 

**** off you work shy dim wit

1509tarpon_75_.gif
Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

"Sorry spelling was never my strongest fingers on key board get carried away but that doesnt make you a bad person "

 

As for tony and cherie let them pay the 50% i paid 40% tax for quite a few years when i worked offshore in 80ss and 90ss if you earn it you pay it i find nothing wrong in that neither should they .

.

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)

A hailing sucess wait a minuite not really a disaster in the making.

 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/bedroom-tax-fails-free-up-3297046

 

paul.

no no, a success http://www.expressandstar.com/business/uk-money/2014/03/28/bedroom-tax-saves-1m-a-day/

 

certainly don't appear to be a disaster as the mirror rag is claiming, far from it:

 

Employment Minister Esther McVey said around 8% of those affected had so far moved to a smaller property and insisted that meant the policy was "exactly on track".

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
rob.imk2 Member

rob.imk2

Posted
Posted

no no, a success http://www.expressandstar.com/business/uk-money/2014/03/28/bedroom-tax-saves-1m-a-day/

 

certainly don't appear to be a disaster as the mirror rag is claiming, far from it:

 

Employment Minister Esther McVey said around 8% of those affected had so far moved to a smaller property and insisted that meant the policy was "exactly on track".

It was 9 per cent that was quoted last nigh on the beeb news

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept