Jump to content

Same sex marriage

Andrew

By Andrew
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

Personally, it's no skin off my nose what gay people do, why would I want to interfere? They want to get married, good for them. Can't understand why anyone would be insulted by it, but then I don't have any dislike of gay people and don't understand why anyone else has. Times change, I guess.

 

PnENe.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

IanBass
IanBass

It was, and still is, a very difficult subject for some people to deal with. MY opinion(and I realise there will be one's that differ to mine) is that it's about time tha BOTH the main Churches in thi

Steve Walker
Steve Walker

I think it's up to churches who they marry in their own church and nothing to do with them who gets married in civil ceremonies or in anyone else's church.

Steve Walker
Steve Walker

Wouldn't have taken so much parliamentary time if there hadn't been so much effort put into blocking it...

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Wouldn't have taken so much parliamentary time if there hadn't been so much effort put into blocking it...

just like the fox hunting bill?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Quite right there was a lot of effort put in to blocking it. There are quite a lot of us who find the use of the word "gay" and same sex marriage to be an insult to us normal people.

 

Problem I will have at the next election is just which party to vote for, where does UKIP stand on this issue ? because I won't be voting tory or labour or liberal after the way they seem to be bulldozing this act through without the consent of the voters.

 

Den

ahah, here ya go Den, wondering why this bill was sooooooooooooooo important as it wasn't within the co's manifesto when they formed the government: http://www.ukip.org/content/latest-news/2938-eu-proposal-is-behind-samesex-marriage-furore

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
garylee Member

garylee

Posted
Posted

Steve/Barry did you know that one in three men have homosexual tendencies: give me a kiss and I'll

tell you which one of us it is :kissing:

Smile they said life could get worse, I did and it was

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Cameron is forcing nothing through, MP's had a free vote they voted in favour, get over it!

 

 

Who said he was forcing it through, i said RUSHING it through. Get your facts right. :icecream:

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
The Flying Tench Member

The Flying Tench

Posted
Posted

It was, and still is, a very difficult subject for some people to deal with. MY opinion(and I realise there will be one's that differ to mine) is that it's about time tha BOTH the main Churches in this Country came into the present and stopped living in the dim and distant past, accepted Gay people for who they are and as a Church embrased and accepted them into their congregation. With all the anti gay,anti gay marriage that is spouted on behalf of so called religous leaders today, is it any wonder Churches are virtually empty on Sundays and people are turning away from religion in general in their droves.

Ian, I'm an Anglican vicar. You seem to be saying that the churches should reflect the general views in the culture - and I agree with you that we lose people, particularly young adults, by not doing so. But are you therefore saying that 50 years ago the church was RIGHT to oppose gay sex? Surely, the same argument would apply, wouldn't it?

There's more I could say, but it would be good to hear your answer on this first.

john clarke

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Its been voted thru then !

Edited by Andrew

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ho ho ho hooooooooo

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nick Member

nick

Posted
Posted

Who said he was forcing it through, i said RUSHING it through. Get your facts right. :icecream:

 

Well they're not rushing it through either, just going through in normal parliamentary timetable, so please get your facts right too! :hammer:

Nick

 

 

...life

what's it all about...?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept