Jump to content

E U Robbery


barry luxton

Recommended Posts

Don't you start on me pal, you're just as bad. Any topic at that is being discussed and you and your paranoid, sock puppet mate have to come in and disrupt it like the a pair of play ground bullies that you are.

 

Just in case you hadn't noticed Barry, you live in a socialist country, even when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister it was still a socialist country.

 

Now to get back on topic, I wouldn't have thought you would have given a toss for ex-pat Brits living in Cyprus, after all thats what they get for putting all their eggs in the one basket. If you had your way and we withdrew from the EU they would very likely stand to lose a lot more.

 

The government has said that it will compensate our armed forces and other government employees who have money in Cypriot Banks.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21820237

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surely that should be A.N.?

Nice one Dave!

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ha! You walked right in to my trap you phoney little apology for a man. You witter on about people being "condescending" and "talking down" to you but you think it's alright to go around addressing people as "boy".

 

PS

 

The next time that you reduct a typographical error in one of my posts, try to get it right, try not to make a bigger ape of yourself than you already have. "I've" has a capital "I" and the "ve" is separated by an apostrophe not a semi-colon thus, "I've" and it should have been "writes" not "writes's". The apostrophe in your example is a possesive apostrophe, secondly at least I have the intellect to spell the the word "intellectual" properly.

 

Run along now, there's a nice chap.

 

.WOW insulting my manhood now.

Oh dear me, how very childish of you Cory boy to reduce yourself yet again to petty personal insults

I thought you were better than that old chum. :clap3:

Easy to say walked into your trap after the fact boy, ha ha ha , grasping at straws i think, saw your error and tried in vain to divert away from it.

Spell checker is crap innit dude.

There's a good little boy,have fun.

 

Does your ignorance know no bounds Cory, your very fast at issuing personal insults, how very ignorant of you.

Tell me, are you so brave to issue insults face to face with your victims ?

 

Any topic at that is being discussed and you and your paranoid, sock puppet mate

Edited by Andrew

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It was meant to have a tongue in cheek icon at the end ,i'm the last person to fault grammar ,punctuation ,spelling or general writing stuff especially on this tablet

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't you start on me pal, you're just as bad. Any topic at that is being discussed and you and your paranoid, sock puppet mate have to come in and disrupt it like the a pair of play ground bullies that you are.

 

Just in case you hadn't noticed Barry, you live in a socialist country, even when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister it was still a socialist country.

 

Now to get back on topic, I wouldn't have thought you would have given a toss for ex-pat Brits living in Cyprus, after all thats what they get for putting all their eggs in the one basket. If you had your way and we withdrew from the EU they would very likely stand to lose a lot more.

 

The government has said that it will compensate our armed forces and other government employees who have money in Cypriot Banks.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-21820237

 

 

YIKES more childish personal insults towards me from an intellectual superior :clap3:

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just in case you hadn't noticed Barry, you live in a socialist country, even when Margaret Thatcher was Prime Minister it was still a socialist country.

Now to get back on topic, I wouldn't have thought you would have given a toss for ex-pat Brits living in Cyprus, after all thats what they get for putting all their eggs in the one basket.

 

If you had your way and we withdrew from the EU they would very likely stand to lose a lot more.

 

When i have mentioned that there are 800,000 British living in Spain that would lose their automatic right to live, work and have healthcare there....There has never been any sympathy either

 

And whenever the subject of British subjects getting the same treatment as their fellow British in the way of for example their heating allowance...No support for that either...It has been words to the effect of "If they choose to leave, good riddance to them"

 

So the sudden wave of "patriotic sympathy" for Janet and Alan or whatever they are called is rather hypocritical, and quite amusing actually.

Edited by captain cojones
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You what! You are one cheeky little barsteward. You have the temerity to correct the spelling in one of my posts, and make a complete ass of yourself in the process and then you feel hard done by.

 

EVERY poster on AN is your intellectual superior.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You what! You are one cheeky little barsteward. You have the temerity to correct the spelling in one of my posts, and make a complete ass of yourself in the process and then you feel hard done by.

 

EVERY poster on AN is your intellectual superior.

:roll1::roll1::roll1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think if anyone leaves our shore even for a holiday its firmly made clear the advantages of being in england (small they maybe) are lost ,if they go for more than a fortnight the door is firmly closed behind them.

After all if they prefer foreigners over brits they can join them and become them for the gains or losses in the particular country they choose

No-one forces them to go abroad so no whining when it all goes tits up and they want back in usually demanding we sort their miserable lives out ,if they do good in their adopted country good on them but they remain there for ever and never darken englands door for any reason pretty please

Even better just fit turnstiles on the borders that only rotate outwards

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You what! You are one cheeky little barsteward. You have the temerity to correct the spelling in one of my posts, and make a complete ass of yourself in the process and then you feel hard done by.

 

EVERY poster on AN is your intellectual superior.

what a handbagger.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.