Jump to content

so sorry big cod

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

Mitchell wasn't on trial, remember, the case was against the newspaper for libel. He lost it because the judge thought that on the balance of probabilities, the newspaper's claim that he called the man a "pleb" was probably true. If Mitchell had been on trial for a criminal act which hinged on whether he said "pleb" or not, I should think he'd have been acquitted. It would be perfectly possible to have both verdicts without any contradiction!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 34
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

chesters1
chesters1

Unfortunately governments selling things belonging to the people is not new when they need a bit of cash for their trough Gordon brown sold a fair bit which you forgot to mention . Good blinkers you

gozzer
gozzer

Beat you to it Barry   Ooops no I didn't, bugger!   John.

Andrew
Andrew

You done what some would not bro.

corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

Mitchell wasn't on trial, remember, the case was against the newspaper for libel. He lost it because the judge thought that on the balance of probabilities, the newspaper's claim that he called the man a "pleb" was probably true. If Mitchell had been on trial for a criminal act which hinged on whether he said "pleb" or not, I should think he'd have been acquitted. It would be perfectly possible to have both verdicts without any contradiction!

Spot on Steve.Different burdens of proof in Civil Court v Criminal Court.
  • Like 1

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Mitchell wasn't on trial, remember, the case was against the newspaper for libel. He lost it because the judge thought that on the balance of probabilities, the newspaper's claim that he called the man a "pleb" was probably true. If Mitchell had been on trial for a criminal act which hinged on whether he said "pleb" or not, I should think he'd have been acquitted. It would be perfectly possible to have both verdicts without any contradiction!

 

Does this mean I have to retract my apology to big cod. :yeah:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

Mitchell wasn't on trial, remember, the case was against the newspaper for libel. He lost it because the judge thought that on the balance of probabilities, the newspaper's claim that he called the man a "pleb" was probably true. If Mitchell had been on trial for a criminal act which hinged on whether he said "pleb" or not, I should think he'd have been acquitted. It would be perfectly possible to have both verdicts without any contradiction!

 

I think as far as the general public were concerned, it was as good as being on trial, and he has been found guilty. Guilty of being an arrogant prat. After all, what kind of idiot goes to a large security gate, on a push bike, and demand that security open it for him, when there is a small side gate there for his use.

Maybe he needed a wide gate to accommodate his ego.

 

John

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

I think as far as the general public were concerned, it was as good as being on trial, and he has been found guilty. Guilty of being an arrogant prat. After all, what kind of idiot goes to a large security gate, on a push bike, and demand that security open it for him, when there is a small side gate there for his use.

Maybe he needed a wide gate to accommodate his ego.

 

John

 

 

come on, a tiny bit of latitude is required, he must have been a very fast talker at the time, or his 'f' off speech to the copper must have been totally rehearsed at the time, due to the very little time the engagement took as confirmed on video, in addition there was the so called facts put up by the copper's alleged witnesses, off duty coppers that where no where to be seen again on the video that we all watched. Wasn't two or three of them convicted and at least one was jailed?

 

arrogant prat well yes, he certainly is.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted

Does this mean I have to retract my apology to big cod. :yeah:

 

No way barry cant do that :icecream: the mans a billy liar the judge didnt belive him he stuck by his original statement he couldbt back peddal only cost him 3m is that out of sheer arrogance or what to me its a man again who thinks he is above the law and as it was proved he is deffernetly not.

 

The only bit what makes you cringe is the sun comic has come good out this holding there integrity they still cant hardly sell a copy in liverpool now for what they printed about about hillsborough disaster.

 

paul.

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

what's the name of that other news paper where the owner decided to jump ship a few years ago now, did the pensioners ever recover their money? :whistling:

 

ahh: http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/nov/03/pressandpublishing-daily-mirror

 

Within a couple of minutes we discovered that the plane report was wrong. Maxwell was missing from his yacht, which had not gone down. Maxwell had.

 

Talking about lack of integrity, here's another thief: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1266662/The-man-stole-old-age-How-Gordon-Brown-secretly-imposed-ruinous-tax-wrecked-retirements-millions.html

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

what's the name of that other news paper where the owner decided to jump ship a few years ago now, did the pensioners ever recover their money? :whistling:

 

ahh: http://www.theguardian.com/media/greenslade/2011/nov/03/pressandpublishing-daily-mirror

 

Within a couple of minutes we discovered that the plane report was wrong. Maxwell was missing from his yacht, which had not gone down. Maxwell had.

 

Talking about lack of integrity, here's another thief: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1266662/The-man-stole-old-age-How-Gordon-Brown-secretly-imposed-ruinous-tax-wrecked-retirements-millions.html

And you read it in the mail .and you read it in the mail. :doh:

 

Barry if we started topping up what this lot have wasted it runs into billions just for starters the post office was way under valued another give away to there rich friends another sucessfull tory sell off or give away the list is endless.

 

paul.

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept