RMT backs drink driving

[big_cod]

 

Jeez paul, this is getting like dumb and dumber with the bright parts taken out.....

 

Those are not my words, those are the words of UK Government, you know, those people who make the rules and implement regulations. That is the official UK Government position on angler impact on stocks, it is slanted towards Bass and that favourite industrial take of yours, Cod....mind how you go.....

.

 

Why would put that up on here for what Reason I can read you like a book Steve anti anglerk again why would you post that on here and for what reason answer the question . .

Edited March 10, 2015 by big_cod

[stevieg]

 

.

 

Why would put that up on here for what Reason I can read you like a book Steve anti anglerk again why would you post that on here and for what reason answer the question . .

I am anything but an anti-angler, be under no illusions otherwise.

 

I put it up in response to this from you -

 

 

Steve you just don't give up local fishermen the bulk are totally against scallop dredgeing in its present format they need regulating it has allready started and it will not stop there winge all you like mate times ticking away .

 

....time is indeed ticking away, some of us are bright enough to realise this while others seem completely oblivious to what is happening in the big bad real world.

 

It illustrates very well that angling activities are also very much under scrutiny, angler cod and Bass take were not quantified as part of SA2012 for fun.

Edited March 10, 2015 by stevieg

[barry luxton]

At present b c there is co-operation from some in the commercial sector who are thankfully helping in resisting the real anti anglers. Those are TAT and BASS roskilly Mitchell and gilbert down the south west who are pushing both the e u and defra, mmo for bass restrictions on the rsa and commercial sector, using aged science from one part of the channel. While claiming that the whole of the stock in the uk is about to fall off a cliff.

 

Those commercial guys obviously can see through the spin, just like the spin you are using regarding your pool table coast and missing cod stocks.

[big_cod]

At present b c there is co-operation from some in the commercial sector who are thankfully helping in resisting the real anti anglers. Those are TAT and BASS roskilly Mitchell and gilbert down the south west who are pushing both the e u and defra, mmo for bass restrictions on the rsa and commercial sector, using aged science from one part of the channel. While claiming that the whole of the stock in the uk is about to fall off a cliff.

 

Those commercial guys obviously can see through the spin, just like the spin you are using regarding your pool table coast and missing cod stocks.

No spin here Barry you know nothing about our coastline I don't look short term what we have or maybe HAD here the best ground around the uk here at the moment being plundered maybe you don't give a **** but I do .

 

Shell fishermen are also echoing the same worries .

 

Paul

[stevieg]

No spin here Barry you know nothing about our coastline I don't look short term what we have or maybe HAD here the best ground around the uk here at the moment being plundered maybe you don't give a **** but I do .

 

Shell fishermen are also echoing the same worries .

 

Paul

 

Now now paul, our allies are watching you major local Cod stock impactors very closely.....

 

[Phone]

All,

 

BINGO !!

 

Everyone of these illogical facilities is now contained this thread. Can you guess which was the last to appear?

• Ad hoc — Yanking shoddy explanations from where the sun don't shine in an attempt to make a hypothesis fit the data.
• Argument by assertion — The belief that if you say something enough times, it eventually becomes true and therefore you win the argument.
• Bullshit — Placing your argument above the truth.
• Equivocation — Deliberately substituting the meaning of a given word in one context for another context that is inappropriate in order to make your argument.
• Extended analogy - Arguing an opponent's analogy that A is like B in one particular way is a claim that A and B are directly comparable to one another.
• Fallacy fallacy - The meta-fallacious argument that your opponent (or someone arguing for a similar point) has used logical fallacies, therefore the argument is wrong.
• False analogy — Use of a flawed or self-refuting analogy.
• Generalisation from fictional evidence
• Great Beethoven fallacy
• Moving the goalposts — Changing evidential requirements in an argument once they have been met, "what I really meant was..."
• Red herring — A group of fallacies which bring up a fact which is irrelevant to the issue, in an attempt to distract the opponent and/or audience.
• Straw man — Distorting an opponent's position for greater rhetorical flexibility.

Phone

source: Phone and he lies.

[big_cod]

 

Now now paul, our allies are watching you major local Cod stock impactors very closely.....

 

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/feb/10/scallop-wars-on-britains-west-coast Edited March 12, 2015 by big_cod

[chesters1]

All,

 

BINGO !!

 

Everyone of these illogical facilities is now contained this thread. Can you guess which was the last to appear?

• Ad hoc — Yanking shoddy explanations from where the sun don't shine in an attempt to make a hypothesis fit the data.
• Argument by assertion — The belief that if you say something enough times, it eventually becomes true and therefore you win the argument.
• Bullshit — Placing your argument above the truth.
• Equivocation — Deliberately substituting the meaning of a given word in one context for another context that is inappropriate in order to make your argument.
• Extended analogy - Arguing an opponent's analogy that A is like B in one particular way is a claim that A and B are directly comparable to one another.
• Fallacy fallacy - The meta-fallacious argument that your opponent (or someone arguing for a similar point) has used logical fallacies, therefore the argument is wrong.
• False analogy — Use of a flawed or self-refuting analogy.
• Generalisation from fictional evidence
• Great Beethoven fallacy
• Moving the goalposts — Changing evidential requirements in an argument once they have been met, "what I really meant was..."
• Red herring — A group of fallacies which bring up a fact which is irrelevant to the issue, in an attempt to distract the opponent and/or audience.
• Straw man — Distorting an opponent's position for greater rhetorical flexibility.

Phone

source: Phone and he lies.

Alof the above used by all sides in every argument ,there is no such thing as truth except what you want it to be ,truth just gets in the way occasionally.

[barry luxton]

http://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Generalization_from_fictional_evidence

 

 

Bet b c can relate to that one.

[big_cod]

No scallopers in sight do I have to leave this tommorow .

t

Edited March 12, 2015 by big_cod