Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38

Recommended Posts

Andy_1984 Member

Andy_1984

Posted
Posted

She puts me in mind of some of these Christians who become Moslems. One week they are preaching that the only way to get to heaven is by accepting Jesus as your Lord and Saviour, they week after they are proclaiming that there is only one god, his name is Allah and Mohammed is his prophet.

 

The ironical part is those who voted Brexit because they wanted back their "soveriegnty" are upset that a foreign woman had to go all the way to the highest court in the land to make the point that Parliament is sovereign not the Administration.

 

Of course Maggie Mae does not have to accept the Supreme Court ruling, she could always appeal to the European Court of Justice Paul ;-)

 

Didnt Stasi May say she was going to go over the courts head ?

 

Also Scotland, N. Ireland, and Wales aint allowed a say. feckin shambles the whole lot of it so fed up with UK politics and politicians. Armageddon cant come soon enough.

Owner of Tacklesack.co.uk


Moderator at The-Pikers-Pit.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • big_cod

    2467

  • chesters1

    1900

  • barry luxton

    1362

  • Ken L

    996

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dales
Dales

I have always been Pro Europe and despite not liking a lot of the silly rules and regulations that comes with membership I always thought that the general idea of membership is a good thing.   Howev

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Far better to have a frog in your throat for a year or so than the French, Germans and a few others shafting you in the ass for decades to come. Oh look Ethel, a short post.

chesters1
chesters1

Cheap scallops?

Posted Images

big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted

 

Didnt Stasi May say she was going to go over the courts head ?

 

Also Scotland, N. Ireland, and Wales aint allowed a say. feckin shambles the whole lot of it so fed up with UK politics and politicians. Armageddon cant come soon enough.

It's on it's way trumps in charge ?

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted (edited)

It's on it's way trumps in charge

Good. Maybe he can build you a beautiful wall and make you buggers pay ;-)

Edited by corydoras

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

big_cod, on 26 Jan 2017 - 10:39, said:

Some of the comments on social media about a so called foreign lady going to court is shocking they haven't a clue I honest think they really don't know what they actually voted for they will soon Find out .

 

I know exactly what I voted for.

 

Now tell me what did you vote for, start with the cfp and the cap and schengan. Then carry on with your e u praises where the likes of the kinnoks are rewarded most handsomely over the vast amount of unemployment that has been created on the e u mainland along with many of the e u countries so far stuck in the doldrums that they have absolutely no hope of getting sorted any time soon.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

Were not in the shenghan zone ,unfortunately were the bottleneck with a very loose cork

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

corydoras, on 25 Jan 2017 - 23:23, said:

 

 

The ironical part is those who voted Brexit because they wanted back their "soveriegnty" are upset that a foreign woman had to go all the way to the highest court in the land to make the point that Parliament is sovereign not the Administration.

 

 

 

no matter apart from the fact that the old bag's argument will also fall by the wayside within two weeks, she probably cost the u k taxpayers loads of money with her pathetic attempt to delay, derail the inevitable.

 

http://home.bt.com/news/uk-news/legislation-paving-way-for-brexit-to-be-published-11364141763364

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

I know exactly what I voted for.

 

Now tell me what did you vote for, start with the cfp and the cap and schengan. Then carry on with your e u praises where the likes of the kinnoks are rewarded most handsomely over the vast amount of unemployment that has been created on the e u mainland along with many of the e u countries so far stuck in the doldrums that they have absolutely no hope of getting sorted any time soon.

We're not in Schengen, neither is ROI. Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway, and Switzerland are not EU members but are in the Shengen Area. Why do you think that leaving the EU will result in changes in fishing quotas or agricultural subsidies?

 

After we leave the EU we will have a land border with the EU. Are we going to 310 mile long wall between ROI and NI and make the ROI pay for it?

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

chesters1, on 26 Jan 2017 - 18:49, said:

Were not in the shenghan zone ,unfortunately were the bottleneck with a very loose cork

yes thank goodness.

 

It has caused so much damage on the e u's mainland, is the reason why I included it for big cod to tell us the virtues of such a magnificent piece of legislation that is fit for whatever purpose?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

no matter apart from the fact that the old bag's argument will also fall by the wayside within two weeks, she probably cost the u k taxpayers loads of money with her pathetic attempt to delay, derail the inevitable.

 

http://home.bt.com/news/uk-news/legislation-paving-way-for-brexit-to-be-published-11364141763364

I don't think she's older than you mate. I'd not be crawling over her to get to you.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

corydoras, on 26 Jan 2017 - 18:59, said:

I don't think she's older than you mate. I'd not be crawling over her to get to you.

 

 

married mate.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept