Jump to content

Fair play?


kleinboet

Recommended Posts

Chesters.

Not sure if you like smartass quotations but if you do, try:

good stuff and he makes a fine ass pickle as well :thumbs:

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 138
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

good stuff and he makes a fine ass pickle as well

 

I think I'll stick to Branston :D

Species caught in 2020: Barbel. European Eel. Bleak. Perch. Pike.

Species caught in 2019: Pike. Bream. Tench. Chub. Common Carp. European Eel. Barbel. Bleak. Dace.

Species caught in 2018: Perch. Bream. Rainbow Trout. Brown Trout. Chub. Roach. Carp. European Eel.

Species caught in 2017: Siamese carp. Striped catfish. Rohu. Mekong catfish. Amazon red tail catfish. Arapaima. Black Minnow Shark. Perch. Chub. Brown Trout. Pike. Bream. Roach. Rudd. Bleak. Common Carp.

Species caught in 2016: Siamese carp. Jullien's golden carp. Striped catfish. Mekong catfish. Amazon red tail catfish. Arapaima. Alligator gar. Rohu. Black Minnow Shark. Roach, Bream, Perch, Ballan Wrasse. Rudd. Common Carp. Pike. Zander. Chub. Bleak.

Species caught in 2015: Brown Trout. Roach. Bream. Terrapin. Eel. Barbel. Pike. Chub.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will try and put this in words you will understand.

As Total said, a further 300 foreigners are on their way, so why the palaver?

 

The palaver is that TOTAL BROKE the law!! As CC rightly pointed out, the applications have to be for EU residents - TOTAL denied any British worker the right to apply for the positions. All 300 are "imports"!!

 

Thats why they are protesting!!!

Edited by kleinboet

5460c629-1c4a-480e-b4a4-8faa59fff7d.jpg

 

fishing is nature's medical prescription

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will try and put this in words you will understand.

As Total said, a further 300 foreigners are on their way, so why the palaver?

 

The palaver is that TOTAL BROKE the law!! As CC rightly pointed out, the applications have to be for EU residents - TOTAL denied any British worker the right to apply for the positions. All 300 are "imports"!!

 

Thats why they are protesting!!!

 

 

My understanding was that the workers, about which the protests are being made, are Portuguese and Italian and if that's the case, your knowledge of constituent members of the EU is somewhat and regrettably, lacking.

Edited by Alan Stubbs

This is a signature, there are many signatures like it but this one is mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan, If that's the case, why is Brown defending the decision? If we are EU members, then these vacancies should have been advertised within the EU. IF Total have not done that, they have broken EU regs TWICE!!

All Incapability Brown does is say MOST of the workers are British anyway!!

5460c629-1c4a-480e-b4a4-8faa59fff7d.jpg

 

fishing is nature's medical prescription

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I will try and put this in words you will understand.

As Total said, a further 300 foreigners are on their way, so why the palaver?

 

The palaver is that TOTAL BROKE the law!! As CC rightly pointed out, the applications have to be for EU residents - TOTAL denied any British worker the right to apply for the positions. All 300 are "imports"!!

 

Thats why they are protesting!!!

 

i think you are confused here.

total did not "break the law"--they complied with it,by asking for tenders on the open market.

seven companies supplied tenders--5 british, and 2 foriegn.

the foriegn company won the contract.

the foriegn company,bring their company,plus workers,to complete the contract.

the british workers,(as part of the british companies)dont get the work. its that simple.

when one of these companies win contracts,they supply everything,knowledge,materials,AND WORKERS.

thats how it works,whether a british french,dutch or german company wins the contract.

the british arnt working,because their companies didnt win the contract.

question for you.

 

if one of the british companies had won the contract,would the portuguese be complaining,about not being able to do the work?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we are EU members, then these vacancies should have been advertised within the EU.

what vacancies??

it was contracts tendered for......there were no "vacancies" as you put it.And it obviously WAS advertised,thats why an italian company ended up with the job.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was talking about this last night to a friend in the pub. He said it was "Unfair that these foreigners come over here taking British jobs. I can't go and be an accountant in France". When I asked him why not, I got the answer I expected.

"I can't speak French."

I think this says a lot about us Brits in general, and obviously even more about accountants!

I would move to Spain tomorrow. Unfortunately to earn what I earn now doing the job I do now I'd have to be fluent in Spanish. (The thought of the alternative, buying a bar and having to deal with British yob customers all day sends a shiver down my spine.)

That's my problem, not the EU's. It's me that is too lazy to learn Spanish.

Eventually I'll reach a stage when I don't need so much money any more and hopefully the europhobes won't have screwed up my chances of working in the sun as a pool cleaner or whatever!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Alan, If that's the case, why is Brown defending the decision? If we are EU members, then these vacancies should have been advertised within the EU. IF Total have not done that, they have broken EU regs TWICE!!

All Incapability Brown does is say MOST of the workers are British anyway!!

Having prepared multi-national tenders for a healthcare company in the past - and successfully won several, I suggest I know what I'm talking about on a general level, here....

 

The contract was awarded to a company, not individual employees. The successful company can employ anyone who can prove the right to work in the UK. if they have experience of suitably qualified contractors in the past, it makes sound sense to use them. As EU qualified workers, they are deemed to be indigenous.

 

It can safely be suggested that Brown was being consistent in his advocacy of anti-protectionism, an issue he is currently dealing with in respect of the USA's declared 'Buy American' edict to the American people. Again, I stress that I am not a pro-Brown apologist in the least - quite the reverse.

 

Total don't have to advertise the vacancies at all, particularly if they are using legitmately qualified sub-contractors - and there's no evidence to suggest they haven't done so.

 

Reading your posts on this topic, it appears that you're looking for conspiracies which simply don't exist.

 

A propos of nothing in particular, I am amused at the BNP jumping on the protest bandwagon here.... they claim to be acting on behalf of the British worker. An interesting point, and maybe a damascene conversion because there's precious little genuine evidence of them having acted in the interests of the British worker in the past. Unless, of course, Mugabe-esque bully boy tactics are what is seen as pro-British worker.

Edited by Alan Stubbs

This is a signature, there are many signatures like it but this one is mine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A propos of nothing in particular, I am amused at the BNP jumping on the protest bandwagon here....

 

That doesn't surprise me in the least, Alan - the BNP has been making efforts of late to try to hitch traditional English folk music to their obnoxious bandwagon, to the extent of re-issuing complilation cds on their own labels... <_<

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.