Jump to content

Benefit Cuts


Andrew

Recommended Posts

An interesting bit of reporting that one. A newspaper asks a bunch of MP's what they think they should be paid for what they do, averages out the figures and compares them to what those MP's are actually paid and hhey presto, MP's are demanding a 32% salary rise without any of them ever proposing any such thing.

The press is a wonderfull thing....

Surprising how many people swallow every word no? :roll1::roll1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Any bet just before the next election tax cuts will suddenly become a top priority whether we are still in the **** or out of it i think mr cameron and all the press which gather behind the torys can peddle as much crap as they like but the man in the street knows who is getting richer and richer and who is getting poorer and poorer this goverment is as far right than ever and poor mr cleggy boy he has gone against evrything his party believes in god help him his is doomed he has sold his soul to the devil but then he might defect to the tory party wouldnt surprize me.

 

paul.

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

George osborn lies to the back of his teeth with the economy cameron tellls big porkys have a look at this it is extremly interesting exposing a few truths.

 

As a Conservative I have no pleasure in exposing David Cameron's deficit claims.

Firstly, the much banded about 2010 deficit of over 11% is false. This is the PSNB (total borrowings) and not the actual budget deficit which was -7.7% - OBR Economic and Fiscal Outlook March 2012 page 19 table 1.2

Secondly, in 1997 Labour inherited a deficit of 3.9% of GDP (not a balanced budget ) and by 2008 it had fallen to 2.1% - a reduction of a near 50% - Impressive! Hence, it's implausible and ludicrous to claim there was overspending. The deficit was then exacerbated by the global banking crises after 2008. See HM Treasury. Note, the 1994 deficit of near 8% haaaaaah!

 

Read the full report it totally exposes the lies being peddled by osborn and co and his pals in the tory press the times he compaires britain to greece i dont know many times he has said it the mans a plonker.

 

Cant see them printing this in the mail.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ramesh-patel/growth-cameron-austerity_b_2007552.html

 

paul.

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprising how many people swallow every word no? :roll1::roll1:

the spanish press always tell it as it is, no exaggeration, happy new year Captain.. :icecream:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the spanish press always tell it as it is, no exaggeration, happy new year Captain.. :icecream:

They have a legal obligation to report "facts" to the best of their knowledge at the time of printing yes.(Unlike British papers).

 

Printing something that the KNOW to be false is a criminal offence,(unlike British papers) and even an ordinary man in the street has the right to take legal action against the paper by reporting this to the Guardia Civil.(unlike British people who have to take civil action)

 

The British people deserve better, unfortunately their opportunity to have better has been quietly swept under the carpet....(What happened to implementing all the recommendations of the long lasting Leveson enquiry?) The news`papers themselves undermined that and the control/ influence they have over politicians ensured that they can now carry on just as before.

 

More phone hacking type scandals?? Why not...Absolutely nothing has changed.They are the joke of Europe, nobody else takes them seriously.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh haa, what about the reporting of the warship entering gibs waters, in the name of habitat conservation? the brits felt the need to send one of thier boats to shoo it away, surrounded by spanish fishing boats no less. And what about the reporting of all this huge waste dumping, pollution problem that made headline news by a road sweeper and a dust cart at gib airport. a little exaggeration perhaps. :)

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They have a legal obligation to report "facts" to the best of their knowledge at the time of printing yes.(Unlike British papers).

 

Printing something that the KNOW to be false is a criminal offence,(unlike British papers) and even an ordinary man in the street has the right to take legal action against the paper by reporting this to the Guardia Civil.(unlike British people who have to take civil action)

 

The British people deserve better, unfortunately their opportunity to have better has been quietly swept under the carpet....(What happened to implementing all the recommendations of the long lasting Leveson enquiry?) The news`papers themselves undermined that and the control/ influence they have over politicians ensured that they can now carry on just as before.

 

More phone hacking type scandals?? Why not...Absolutely nothing has changed.They are the joke of Europe, nobody else takes them seriously.

 

 

Goes back to the days of Franco and his dictatorship i would imagine. Only been a democracy since 1975 and they think they know it all. :busted_cop:

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Surprising how many people swallow every word no? :roll1::roll1:

 

Maybe the Spanish should teach us then, and YOU being an UNBIASED reporter, what would you suggest.

Spain must be the only country where the press doeas not tell lies, wow, now thats something to behold, do i believe it, do i hell, bent reporter abound all over the world. But you being you would not agree with that now would you. :shutup:

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ahh haa, what about the reporting of the warship entering gibs waters, in the name of habitat conservation? the brits felt the need to send one of thier boats to shoo it away, surrounded by spanish fishing boats no less. And what about the reporting of all this huge waste dumping, pollution problem that made headline news by a road sweeper and a dust cart at gib airport. a little exaggeration perhaps. :)

 

 

Those are your inventions/ interpretations Barry, not exaggerations by anybody else.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="captain cojones" data-cid="5443567" data-time="1357978876"><p>

They have a legal obligation to report "facts" to the best of their knowledge at the time of printing yes.(Unlike British papers).<br />

<br />

Printing something that the KNOW to be false is a criminal offence,(unlike British papers) and even an ordinary man in the street has the right to take legal action against the paper by reporting this to the Guardia Civil.(unlike British people who have to take civil action)<br />

<br />

The British people deserve better, unfortunately their opportunity to have better has been quietly swept under the carpet....(What happened to implementing all the recommendations of the long lasting Leveson enquiry?) The news`papers themselves undermined that and the control/ influence they have over politicians ensured that they can now carry on just as before.<br />

<br />

More phone hacking type scandals?? Why not...Absolutely nothing has changed.They are the joke of Europe, nobody else takes them seriously.</p></blockquote>

 

I think the real difference is were not afraid to be lied to just as the gullible are allowed to believe them ,you cannot buy the sun in spsin then?

It must be terrible to live in a country where your told what to believe by default strange you are let onto the www with all its lies,perhaps that will stop if it undermines the government opinion on everything

You will find when the government decide what truth is a great deal of it gets hidden under the carpet especially when it concerns the government

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.