Photo Challenge #25: Movement

[Colin Brett]

 

More water please

 

 

Shoooo!!!

 

 

Make = KONICA MINOLTA

Model = DiMAGE A200

Orientation = top/left

X Resolution = 72

Y Resolution = 72

Resolution Unit = inch

Software = Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows

Date Time = 2006-11-11 20:33:11

[Camera]

Exposure Time = 1/400"

F Number = F3.2

Exposure Program = Shutter priority

ISO Speed Ratings = 200

Exif Version = Version 2.21

Date Time Original = 2006-11-04 09:51:01

Date Time Digitized = 2006-11-04 09:51:01

Max Aperture Value = F3.2

Metering Mode = CenterWeightedAverage

Light Source = unknown

Flash = Flash did not fire, compulsory flash mode

Focal Length = 18.2mm

Subject Area = Rectangle: center(x=1632, y=1224), width=424, height=325

Exif Image Width = 675

Exif Image Height = 482

File Source = DSC

Scene Type = A directly photographed image

Custom Rendered = Normal process

Exposure Mode = Auto exposure

White Balance = Auto white balance

Focal Length In 35mm Film = 70mm

Scene Capture Type = Normal

Subject Distance Range = Distant view

 

Colin

[Steve Randles]

In a Spin

 

Exposure Time = 1/4"

F Number = F8

Exposure Program = Manual

ISO Speed Ratings = 100

 

 

Gravity

 

Exposure Time = 1/3"

F Number = F8

Exposure Program = Manual

ISO Speed Ratings = 100

 

 

Steve...

[phil dean]

I assume entries are closed now and I'm allowed to post????

 

Some great photos again.............

[Snatcher]

Some great shots as Phil said. Personally I was a bit stuck for ideas. Really enjoying these challenges I will have a go at the lines one outside the comp and post it up after the winner is picked. Cannot sit on the sidelines twiddling my thumbs just cos I am not eligible

[Guest CJS2]

Call me pedantic, disqualify pics, OK, but where is the the 'date and camera' on the entry 'Gravity'??? Andy, did at least, put the date on, obviusly not understanding the 'date limitation'.

 

Quote:-

Your posts must include the following information:

Title:

Date Taken:

Camera Used:

 

Camera Settings

ISO

Shutter Speed

Aperture

 

or the Camera shooting mode used (Landscape, Macro etc etc)

 

 

I was under the impression this was part of the rules for the photographer to display details as required by the rules??? 'Exif check' shows it as OK, but are we only going to display requirements when it suits us? Or do we all run an Exif check program

 

In fact there appear to be others that do not fully adhered to the rule on details posted?

 

I have problems with the ISO requirement, not available on the basic 'Exif' detail offered by my Canon S50. Just looked at it in detail with the 'Exif check' program and the ISO is there, but what a 'fag'?

 

Level playing field and all that? . . . Perhaps its me, I get things a bit screwy these days. As I say, 'pedantic'??

 

CJS2

Edited November 14, 2006 by CJS2

[BoozleBear]

Title: 1,2,3...Jump!

 

Date: 17th October

Time: 11.15am

Camera: Casio Exlim Digital 7.2 mega pixels

 

 

Cheers,

 

Simon

 

EDIT: This was taken on 24th October, not the 17th. I knew it was a Tuesday but got the wrong week - as mentioned on the 'kids' post my wife took it so I am entering it on her behalf. If need be I can prove that I was at work on 17th, and not on holiday in cornwall with my family, and that we were on 24th. My lack of posts on the fishing and non-fishing forums should mirror that. Cheers, waffle over! Simon

Edited November 15, 2006 by BoozleBear

[Steve Randles]

Andy, did at least, put the date on, obviusly not understanding the 'date limitation'.

 

Yes I grant you he did put the date on, unfortunately it was a fabricated one, check the posting then check with an exif viewer

 

It does show that I am human, I forgot, its as simple as that as I was in a rush (note the time posted). The main emphasis is on the challenge itself and being challenged within the time frame of the open period. I maintain it was a correct decision by me to disqualify the entry as I did. I overlook little indiscretions all the time and if I had posted it in good time there would have been every chance of my entry being corected.

 

As many of you know, I spend a lot of time pm'ing people to have their entries corrected, and/or help them with that.

 

Steve...

Edited November 14, 2006 by Steve Randles

[Guest CJS2]

It does show that I am human, I forgot, its as simple as that as I was in a rush (note the time posted). The main emphasis is on the challenge itself and being challenged within the time frame of the open period. I maintain it was a correct decision by me to disqualify the entry as I did. I overlook little indiscretions all the time and if I had posted it in good time there would have been every chance of my entry being corected.

 

As many of you know, I spend a lot of time pm'ing people to have their entries corrected, and/or help them with that.

 

Steve...

 

Steve, I can sometimes be a 'pedantic grumpy old $0D' the worst kind The pic by Andy was justifiably disqualified, Andy posting it in 'innocence' and misunderstanding, including the date in the details!

 

I understand the time factor, I only posted one pic., no time for more in the period.

 

Its simply that things appear to be getting sloppy? Or should that be relaxed

 

CJS2 Cliff

[Steve Randles]

Its simply that things appear to be getting sloppy? Or should that be relaxed

 

CJS2 Cliff

 

Not at all, far from it in fact. I check every entry as best I can but I also have to bear in mind that we are not a professional photo forum, we are essentially a collection of anglers who have an interest in photography - and that I feel is the most important thing. We all have varying skill levels and we must not forget that, if you see someone posting incorrectly then please do pm them and help them get it right.

 

In the past I have resized peoples entries and posted it for them because they may be "tehno-phobes" for want of a better word and just dont have a clue where to start in changing image sizes. I've checked exif details and also added that to the post before now too, along with pm'ing people to let them know what to change or that their photo does not meet the requirements, for example not taken within the time frame.

 

Steve...

[Guest CJS2]

Not at all, far from it in fact. I check every entry as best I can but I also have to bear in mind that we are not a professional photo forum, we are essentially a collection of anglers who have an interest in photography - and that I feel is the most important thing. We all have varying skill levels and we must not forget that, if you see someone posting incorrectly then please do pm them and help them get it right.

 

In the past I have resized peoples entries and posted it for them because they may be "tehno-phobes" for want of a better word and just dont have a clue where to start in changing image sizes. I've checked exif details and also added that to the post before now too, along with pm'ing people to let them know what to change or that their photo does not meet the requirements, for example not taken within the time frame.

 

Steve...

 

 

Fair enough Steve, not giving credit for how much work you do put in behind the scenes, sorry, and 'thankyou'. Not trying to rattle anyone's cage, least of all yours. . . Relaxed is best . . . as you say, we are not in it for anything except the pleasure, of which I have had my share, plus a deeper apreciation of my photographic efforts.

Cliff