Jump to content

Are you serious Gordon

Huge_Vitae

By Huge_Vitae
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

not sure when they decided to lordicate mandleson but i had an inkling (another chesters1 scoop)

http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/forums/Republi...mp;hl=mandleson

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted
not sure when they decided to lordicate mandleson but i had an inkling (another chesters1 scoop)

http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/forums/Republi...mp;hl=mandleson

 

Ah, it's all your fault then.

GB probably read your post and thought.....

 

"Of course, I'd forgotten about him. If I get him back in the government then the electorate can have someone to despise even more than they despise me. He's bound to screw up fairly rapidly so then we can sack him again in a great blaze of moral indignation and I can blame it all on Tony Blair, or Maggie Thatcher, or Alastair Darling..... or anyone but me.....

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Tempreature is rising nicely for joined at the hip with gb, mandelson. More will come out no doubt, wonder if this is the downward slope for the lords newest member.

 

http://news.aol.co.uk/pressure-rises-on-ma...421400498155704

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

You mean he has been caught not being entirely truthful?

Well!! I'm shocked and stunned :D

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Newt Member

Newt

Posted
Posted
Was it somewhere on this board that somebody enlightened me that 'X' percentage of the population were Gay?.

Me and I used the figure of 10%. That is the rough percentage that are inclined that way from birth although many may not actively participate in homosexual relationships.

" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted
Was it somewhere on this board that somebody enlightened me that 'X' percentage of the population were Gay?.
Me too, 8%-10%

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept