Jump to content

Sea Fishing Licence - would you pay?

Fastrantiger

By Fastrantiger
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

Jim Roper Member

Jim Roper

Posted
Posted
Who did then Jim. It was your loaded question.

It's my perception that it was the people claiming to represent RSA's, hoping to demonstrate their political clout.

https://www.harbourbridgelakes.com/


Pisces mortui solum cum flumine natant

You get more bites on Anglers Net

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 296
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Ken Davison South Wales Member

Ken Davison South Wales

Posted
Posted

I only made the remark because such a fuss was made about having a separate forum for Conservation and Politics :rolleyes:

 

I think it should be well aired and voted against a separate forum, unfortunately today conservation and politics are a very important part of sea angling.

 

Sorry if my remark caused offence.

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
I only made the remark because such a fuss was made about having a separate forum for Conservation and Politics :rolleyes:

 

I think it should be well aired and voted against a separate forum, unfortunately today conservation and politics are a very important part of sea angling.

 

Sorry if my remark caused offence.

 

Don't beat yourself up too much over it Ken. If the issue is so important as Steve makes out it don't matter much what forum it's posted on. There are others on here who do not post elsewere on this web site, so what. I don't do coarse fishing or yaking, don't stop me from posting though if i feel the need. Regards to censorship, how ridiculous. If he felt that strongly over it, why not ask for it to be moved back ist.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cranfield Member

Cranfield

Posted
Posted

I was one of those that argued for a separate section for Conservation and Politics, as the Sea Angling section was getting overwhelmed with C & P threads.

 

I thought the reason for this thread starting and staying on Sea Angling, was to get the views of the "ordinary" Sea Anglers that frequented that section.

 

A sensible Moderator would move it back.

"I gotta go where its warm, I gotta fly to saint somewhere "

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
I was one of those that argued for a separate section for Conservation and Politics, as the Sea Angling section was getting overwhelmed with C & P threads.

 

I thought the reason for this thread starting and staying on Sea Angling, was to get the views of the "ordinary" Sea Anglers that frequented that section.

 

A sensible Moderator would move it back.

 

Why don't you ask them to move it or ask them to split it one for each section? Whats the big deal. What about the guys on c&p are they not classed as 'ordinary' as well.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Cranfield Member

Cranfield

Posted
Posted
Why don't you ask them to move it or ask them to split it one for each section? Whats the big deal. What about the guys on c&p are they not classed as 'ordinary' as well.

 

Its no big deal to me, I was just explaining why I thought it was on the Sea Angling section.

 

The second person to post on the thread was a Moderator and he didn't think it needed moving and the third person to post was you and you made no comment about where it was posted.

So why couldn't it have stayed where it was ?

 

I believe there are some very "ordinary" guys on C&P.

"I gotta go where its warm, I gotta fly to saint somewhere "

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Holmesy Member

Holmesy

Posted
Posted

Let's be very clear on a few things. This government has had several opportunities to show us, anglers, that they were serious about providing us with an "improved angling experience". There was a motion to raise the minimum landing size for bass to 45cm, backed by Bradshaw, a size that would've given the fish chance to spawn. What did we get? No change, its still acceptable to land juvenile fish. ICES scientists advise a reduction in the cod quota to maintain the species ( not for anglers but for the fish! ), what did we get? We got an 11% increase in the cod quota, fought for by our current fisheries minister. Along with the commercial bias who guides him, do they know better than marine scientists? They sent a pretty clear signal where anglers sit in the scheme of things.

 

The one good thing this government have done was let the bank of England decide the interest rate, sensible to let people who know what they are doing make key decisions. What we do with fisheries "management" is manage for death and decline and its all over seen by a fruit picker turned council worker from Kent. Yes I'll pay for a licence because I'm a law abiding citizen who doesn't want to look over my shoulder everytime I go fishing, but I'll get less than feck all for my money.

http://www.anglia-sportcast.co.uk

 

http://www.leader-lines.com

 

http://www.east-anglia-sea-angling.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
glennk Member

glennk

Posted
Posted

Ken,

 

Its not just the north east who oppose these things mate, infact there will be plenty around here in favour of the damn thing. quite possibly a large percentage of anglers from your area will oppose it Ken. Seek out a local forum, go down your local fishing clubs, ask them the question. The people opposing the licence on here and wsf arent just from the north east.

 

I understand where you get this perception from as its me who often shouts loudest but please dig a little further before making blanket statements like that one :) :) B)

Kayak Fishing Launch Sites

 

COD COD COD COD COD

 

50lb Shore Cod

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept