cake and eat it

[corydoras]

You cannot choose your sex but you can choose who to have sex with or are you run by your urges?

If a man has sex with a boy child not only is he a paedophile hes also gay ,the same goes if a women has sex with a girl child they are also gay.

It gets a little confusing if you hang on both sides of the fence but all are paedophiles.

I guess in some countries men and child brides are common to us they are peadophiles to them normal

 

I see its the jump on chesters thing again ,nowhere have i said its normal i was thinking was it different in pedo rings ,do you get more points buggering a boy or shafting a girl

I only "jump on chesters" when chesters spouds wads of old rubbish. Edited November 6, 2014 by corydoras

[corydoras]

I am free to choose who I provide my services to long may that freedom remain. Unfortunatly others have their hands tied and the p c brigade are rubbing their hands with glee, pathetic, just like the pathetic creature who set this shop keeper up.

That's where you are wrong Barry. The minute that you refuse a job saying that your not going to do the job because of the prospective clients race or sexuality or is otherwise disciminatory then you'll find yourself on the wrong side of the law.

 

your not suggesting you support suicide now are you

Suicide is not against the law. The only dinosaurs I see posting in this thread are Den, Chesters and yourself. Edited November 6, 2014 by corydoras

[chesters1]

I only "jump on chesters" when chesters spouds wads of old rubbish.

So come on whats wrong ,man has sex with man child hes gay ,women on girl child gay ,both gay but both also pedophiles or do you regard children having no sex or those having sex with the same sex a majority thus normal or perhaps you reguard children as sexless so its just a underage sex thing?

 

Remember it was i that made the effort to seperate gay from pedophile IE being gay is not the same as being a pedophile automatically

 

Have you a problem with gays cory ,hiding some dark thoughts perhaps ,or does linda in the flat below look older than the 12 years she is?

 

As i painfully pointed out i have no bother with gays and in reality have no nightmares regarding paedophiles not then or 50 years later, if i had kids perhaps i would but they are far more open than my day my knowledge of paedophilia was limited when i was 9 or 10

Edited November 6, 2014 by chesters1

[corydoras]

No chesters I have no problems with gays. I do have a problem with adults who sexually abuse pre-pubescent children, regardless of the gender of the perpetrator or the victim.

 

I live in a ground floor flat ;-)

[chesters1]

Shes the one in the basement ,the one that cries a lot

 

Hmm if a known gay pedo grits his teeth and has sex with a little girl does he go up in the pedo rankings,or perhaps down ?

Careful with your wording theres a bigger gap between puberty and the age of consent than 50 years ago ,are you saying its ok if it post pubescent so long as its under the age of consent?

Edited November 6, 2014 by chesters1

[Steve Walker]

As i painfully pointed out i have no bother with gays and in reality have no nightmares regarding paedophiles not then or 50 years later, if i had kids perhaps i would but they are far more open than my day my knowledge of paedophilia was limited when i was 9 or 10

Nowadays they know enough about it to know they can threaten to drop the p-bomb on any adults who tell them off!

[chesters1]

Nowadays they know enough about it to know they can threaten to drop the p-bomb on any adults who tell them off!

Knowledge is not always a good thing depending on how its used ,i am sure such a thing would never have occurred 50 years ago ,perhaps because the "act" was seen with different eyes than today? Or perhaps only slightly unnormal ,in private education i presume not being buggered was considered abnormal LOL

I presume the higher ranks of police and certainly the courts thought such things commonplace so didnt regard it as a crime at all ,the old "it didnt do me any harm" the excuse by the lower class for thumping children

Edited November 6, 2014 by chesters1

[barry luxton]

That's where you are wrong Barry. The minute that you refuse a job saying that your not going to do the job because of the prospective clients race or sexuality or is otherwise disciminatory then you'll find yourself on the wrong side of the law.

 

Suicide is not against the law. The only dinosaurs I see posting in this thread are Den, Chesters and yourself.

no the only thing that cake guy did when he fell into the honey pit trap was to open his mouth, all he had to do was to say no (haven't got any of that special marzipan you require) and that actifist wouldn't have been able to do ziltch.

[corydoras]

no the only thing that cake guy did when he fell into the honey pit trap was to open his mouth, all he had to do was to say no (haven't got any of that special marzipan you require) and that actifist wouldn't have been able to do ziltch.

Like I said Barry, some bad ideas only go away when the old gits who hold them die off.

Edited November 7, 2014 by corydoras

[Phone]

Cory,

 

This is the big one Elizabeth

 

Phone