suns going

[barry luxton]

 

to pot.

 

can we have a cost reduction please.

 

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30891939

[chesters1]

I only look at newspapers rather than reading them so now i have less reason to buy it ,all went downhill since vanya disapeared anyway ,the mrs will read every word and believe them because its "in the newspaper" unfortunately

Then there was a fox and fake tea claims

 

Pretty bad english noticed the words. "barb wire" rather than barbed wire ,the bbc is getting as bad as well

Edited January 20, 2015 by chesters1

[Now there's a right un.]

I only buy the Newspaper for Hagar, been a follower for years.

Always new the Sun would bow to the will of those opposed to the topless models when George and Lyn was scrapped.

 

All the moaners need to remember that page 3 was great for job and wealth creation. Many models went on to have productive futures.

Wonder if any campaigners against page 3 go topless when on foreign holidays, or maybe they are so insecure and feel threatened by women with great breasts as their own are deficient?

Another case of a minority saying we think it is wrong so it is wrong....makes me sick.

[kirisute]

don't read newspapers and I don't understand the issue with page 3 at all anyway.

beautiful bodies are good to look at!

notice I said bodies...a well sculpted bloke is as good on the eye as a pretty woman.....the human body is beautiful.

as humans we find it pleasurable, in most cases, to look at beautiful bodies.

I guess the issue then comes down to "objectifying" or "degrading" someone.....but I don't see Mens Health being slated for all the scantily clad blokes "nips out" lathered across its front pages.

so does the male of the species degrade a female by looking at her and thinking she is beautiful?

 

its a wonder there are any relationships being started out these days...you cant tell a woman she is pretty, you cant hug them, you cant look at them, you cant let them know your interested, you cant send a valentines card, you cant sit on their doorstep sniffing their panties (apparently that's called stalking these days!!!)

[Andrew]

Dont read such garbage mate.

 

I would hazard a guess and say the liberal do gooders have had a hand in dropping the page three chic's.

The nosy buggers should but out of other peoples " pleasure "

Edited January 20, 2015 by Andrew

[Dales]

If the majority of Sun readers wanted it gone, then it makes sense to loose it. However, if its the usual case of pandering to the minority so as not to upset anyone then its a shame its gone.

 

Surely its up the individual as to how they dress or undress and show their body, if you don't want to be offended/upset don't view it. Maybe they should change page 3 in to a fully clothed page. I suspect most readers will hardly even notice the change.

 

On a positive note it does free up another page for important news items such as see what new part of her body Cheryl got tattoed or how some Z list celeb over came their booze and drugs hell to win celebrity needlework 2015.

[Andrew]

New page three eh.

 

[chesters1]

Dont mock some drive dressed like that around here !

[John S]

Never bought that hack-rag, but when flicking through it at work page 3 is the only good bit in it.

 

I think you'll still be able to have a nipple-count on their website though

[Puzzled]

There was only ever two good things about The Sun and it looks like they're a thing of the past now.

 

Can't believe it still sells in any great numbers, but hey-hoe, each to their own.