Jump to content

Who is the head?


kleinboet

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 39
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest Shots for fun

The Common Market that we voted on and accepted by a small majority, i believe had four fundamental freedoms.

 

The free movement of goods;

The free movement of services and freedom of establishment;

The free movement of persons (and citizenship), including free movement of workers;

The free movement of capital.

 

It was what it said on the box "A Common Market" cutting out and through all the bureaucratic paperwork that existed at the time.

If only we had known what it would develop into the vote would have been a landslide NO.

 

That if only is the reason why we should have a referendum now on the current legislation, most other member Countries are going to consult their people why not the UK?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Common Market that we voted on and accepted by a small majority, i believe had four fundamental freedoms.

 

The free movement of goods;

The free movement of services and freedom of establishment;

The free movement of persons (and citizenship), including free movement of workers;

The free movement of capital.

 

It was what it said on the box "A Common Market" cutting out and through all the bureaucratic paperwork that existed at the time.

If only we had known what it would develop into the vote would have been a landslide NO.

 

That if only is the reason why we should have a referendum now on the current legislation, most other member Countries are going to consult their people why not the UK?

 

Those for principles are absolutely fine. Most of what has happened since was an extension to these things, and completely unexpected by the ordinary citizens. There was no need to take it much further. For one thing the European nations are far too different and not ready to be run a a single giant state.

 

BTW most conservatives voters voted Yes in that referendum, because that was the party directive.

Edited by Lid
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The common market has evolved as a headless, faceless beurocratic bottom less money pit, that is eating away at our feedoms. Our fish stocks will never be safe in their clutches as time has demonstrated. Their claws are out to get as much money out of the uk for nil return, can some one tell us the benifits. Can someone please tell me what is paid in from France Spain Germany each year out of interest.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting data Shots.

 

If I read that page correctly (comparing amount paid in to the EU against amount paid back by the EU), next to Germany who get back only about 54% of what they put in, the UK is in second place getting back about 59%.

 

Nice to be so generous to the 'have not' members though, isn't it? Must give you a warm glow.

" My choices in life were either to be a piano player in a whore house or a politician. And to tell the truth, there's hardly any difference!" - Harry Truman, 33rd US President

Link to comment
Share on other sites

rather on who pays what is there statistics for who gets it back in subsidies or other aid ,theres huge handouts to people producing things we dont want and set aside when surely more should be given to those that grow things we need.

i read of farms that dont need to produce anything and get more in hand outs than if they did and sold it!

the subsidies should be abolished and then farms would fold or diversify instead its pointless having thousands of acres doing nothing.

 

state funding of private companies should also cease i heard the equivilent of half the NHS budged has been squandered on northern rock and the trains busses and most of the ex state run companies still are propped up by the government :angry: :angry: if they cant survive without it re-nationalise it were spending money on it anyway

 

as for propping up the less well off tough none of those buggers propped us up even germany stopped rationing after the war before we did we (GB) dragged ourselves back up through brains and innovation all those ex russian states produce nothing more valuable than turnips! let them rot.

if their happy with having an invader boss them about then they deserve all they get

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Shots for fun
Interesting data Shots.

 

If I read that page correctly (comparing amount paid in to the EU against amount paid back by the EU), next to Germany who get back only about 54% of what they put in, the UK is in second place getting back about 59%.

 

Nice to be so generous to the 'have not' members though, isn't it? Must give you a warm glow.

 

That's quite correct Newt, however, not sure about that warm feeling. :unsure:

Edited by Shots for fun
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thank goodness for maggie otherwise we'd be putting more in to that shower of crooks ,trouble is it's dropping all the time

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes we did join in Common Market and at that time we did have a referendum, which was a marginal yes vote, however what we join then is a million miles away from what we have now and not once have the British electorate been consulted regarding the giving away of our rights.

 

Now is the time for a referendum.

 

Brown will not allow one because he knows full well that it would be a very big NO.

 

The British have been consulted, it's called a vote. I'm not saying that I wouldn't like to asked on this and loads more topics, but the truth of the matter is that "we" vote in the poliiticians to speak on our behalf....

 

Rob.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.