Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Barry READ the post again I said we used to have 15 trawlers here not any more the boats from here are working out of Peterhead slaughtering it off the shetlands 5000 boxes for 1 landing to put it in a nutshell they overfished it here making it unviable but when they stopped cod numbers came back in droves till you pals the Dredgeing boats appeared i cannot wait to see just what brexit doesnt give you the tories sold us down river with Europe they will do it again .

 

 

 

 

 

 

hang on, these underten inshore trawlers allowed to fish inside of 6 mile have now gone all the way to Shetland to fish, you sure?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • big_cod

    2467

  • chesters1

    1900

  • barry luxton

    1362

  • Ken L

    996

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dales
Dales

I have always been Pro Europe and despite not liking a lot of the silly rules and regulations that comes with membership I always thought that the general idea of membership is a good thing.   Howev

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Far better to have a frog in your throat for a year or so than the French, Germans and a few others shafting you in the ass for decades to come. Oh look Ethel, a short post.

chesters1
chesters1

Cheap scallops?

Posted Images

Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

All,

 

Brexit was (and is, IMO) the right direction for Britain. But did Prime Minister Theresa May choose the wrong way to get there in her breakfast speech Wednesday?

 

Was she hedging? What I read seemed very political and subtle. Do British politicians ever say what they mean or do you always have to read between the lines. (???)

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

big_cod, on 18 Jan 2018 - 19:54, said:

Bas are you for real under tens !!!!!!!

 

 

Are you telling us that the cod quota boats also fish inside of 3 mile? are you for real.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

All,

 

Brexit was (and is, IMO) the right direction for Britain. But did Prime Minister Theresa May choose the wrong way to get there in her breakfast speech Wednesday?

 

Was she hedging? What I read seemed very political and subtle. Do British politicians ever say what they mean or do you always have to read between the lines. (???)

 

Phone

Reincarnate Maggie thatcher she'd sort 'em out. non non non

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

Are you telling us that the cod quota boats also fish inside of 3 mile? are you for real.

Barry what the hell are you rambling on about YES bas if you are under 60 ft as long as it isnt a restricted area can can trawl right upto the beach bad aint it but its true .

 

Now here we have brexit voted for by many to keep all the imigrants out and our bungling Boris wants to build a bridge over the channel ? to let them all in now why did they bother building the channel tunnel ?

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

 

 

 

Does this mean we should have the chance to overturn any election result any time we like? That would be handy.

 

I can't understand why, when you lot had a chance of another referendum, you didn't take it, and now you're moaning about it!

 

Strange, strange people.

 

John.

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

 

 

Does this mean we should have the chance to overturn any election result any time we like? That would be handy.

 

I can't understand why, when you lot had a chance of another referendum, you didn't take it, and now you're moaning about it!

 

Strange, strange people.

 

John.

Is it John lets be totally honest the fibs on both sides before the referendum were a little bit wayward nobody can deny that my argument and allways has been people were not told the full facts with brexit now WE know the just what brexit really holds whether you like it not eirher way another referendum would be fair you will argue thats not right but if the people of the uk want another vote now they know just what brexit truelly holds so be it and if brexit is a good as it was pencilled out to be just what have you got to worry about you will be home and dry . Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

Is it John lets be totally honest the fibs on both sides before the referendum were a little bit wayward nobody can deny that my argument and allways has been people were not told the full facts with brexit now WE know the just what brexit really holds whether you like it not eirher way another referendum would be fair you will argue thats not right but if the people of the uk want another vote now they know just what brexit truelly holds so be it and if brexit is a good as it was pencilled out to be just what have you got to worry about you will be home and dry .

 

I'm not worrying Paul, it's you who seem to need to find some reassurance, mainly by trawling the net looking for any kind of affirmation.

 

You still haven't said why, if there are so many wanting a second referendum, why the chance wasn't taken when it was offered.

 

John.

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept