What Neil Armstrong Said...

[chesters1]

how did they stop the film freezing solid on the spool? it would have to be warmed otherwise celluloid types would just shatter and why wasn't it irradiated?

 

 

whoops seems this world front page topping films gone missing ,strange eh?

Edited April 19, 2008 by chesters1

[Guest Rabbit]

The Americans did land on the Moon, because I stayed up all night and watched in the TV room at RAF Lyneham. it was the same TV room that I watched England win the World Cup. no doubt about that unless your Scottish.

[John S]

The film didn't freeze because it wasn't freezing, and it wasn't irradiated because they were on the Moon during a calm period in the Sun's solar cycle.

[Darren T]

and the stars are not visible simply because of the images being exposed for the surface of the moon. If you take a picture of the moon from your back yard and get the exposure right you wont see any stars either. now imagine what its like when you are standing on the moon instead of looking up form earth. the amount of light reflected off of the moons surface is really quite something.

[chesters1]

this is interesting

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

[John S]

 

What a load of rubbish!

 

 

No doubt he also believes in the Loch Ness Monster, fairies at the bottom of the garden, that the Twin Towers were blown up by the American Government and that Diana really was murdered by Prince Philip....

[chesters1]

you seem to me to believe anything any government says ,show me the vehicle tracks on the moon

we probably couldn't land on there now never mind 1969 ,if any one says anything take it with a large pinch of salt if a governments saying it take it with a lorry load.

Apollo 13 was a con to take the masses eyes of how bad things were going in 'nam

show me the pictures of the landing taken from earth its the only proof you need all the rest can be staged ,i even doupt the mars landings that's very easily staged ,pointless taking a governments proof they have a vested interest ,so independent proof please

Edited April 20, 2008 by chesters1

[John S]

I'm not going to waste my time disproving a stupid conspiracy theory, I've got better things to do....

[chesters1]

they are based on just as much "evidence" as the version you believe ,the governments version.

america had to come up with something after being beaten by the russians in getting someone in space so the moon landings were dreamt up to make america look top dog in the space race.

i find it strange the "best" telescope we have can allegedly see far into the universe but cant find a sign of mans exploits on the moon just a stone throw away ,just 3 answers

1) theres nothing to see

2)the telescopes crap

3) both

Edited April 20, 2008 by chesters1

[Mark Crame]

and the stars are not visible simply because of the images being exposed for the surface of the moon. If you take a picture of the moon from your back yard and get the exposure right you wont see any stars either. now imagine what its like when you are standing on the moon instead of looking up form earth. the amount of light reflected off of the moons surface is really quite something.

****s. Both will record correctly at 1/125 @ F8 on ISO 100.So you're saying that the Russia ns went into space then? Got any proof?