Jump to content

UK Laws

Sportsman

By Sportsman
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

It's going to make a lot of lawyers and consultants incredibly rich, it's going to do bugger all at all for the man on the Clapham omnibus. The country has been sold a pig in a poke.

 

 

pig in a poke your just 'p' ssd because Southampton voted out. appears to be 17 million odd who have been duped according to you. Can that many be so misguided? according to you

  • Like 1

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

You can't leave the EU without repealing all of the laws that were passed to join it

 

Parliament would have to amend or repeal a series of other Acts, as well as 44 years worth of EU-derived secondary legislation, especially statutory instruments passed under Section 2(2) of the 1972 Act, which would have no legal effect after it had been repealed, writes Mark DArcy the BBCs parliamentary correspondent.

 

I'm afraid that you can't keep the bits you want and discard the rest. There is not time for all of this to be done by Parliament so the Government will decide what you need.

You dont seem to understand we can do anything we want the EU is a collection of states not some huge country threatening to blow us to hell ,they would love to but i am afraid there is no euro army to do its bidding

 

The masses have always had the choice of choosing what laws to follow its all down to how its enforced ,you simply enforce the native law preceding the directive or just ignore the directive the CPS can decide like they do in all matters of enforcement

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

You've been sold down the river. The UK has just bent over, spread it's butt cheeks and invited the whole world to give it a right royal buggering.

 

You mean like we were back in the seventies? As well as each time subsequent Governments agreed to change the rules, and aims of the original 'Common Market', without any consultation with the population? Only difference is that back then, it was the British Government doing the 'buggering', in tandem with the 'Eurocrats'. Many pigs in pokes have been sold as 'good for the country' in the last 40yrs.

 

John

  • Like 2

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

pig in a poke your just 'p' ssd because Southampton voted out. appears to be 17 million odd who have been duped according to you. Can that many be so misguided? according to you

Sure they can. There are 1.6 billion people in the world who believe with all their hearts that Mohammed flew to Heaven on a winged horse. Are they all wrong? Or do you believe in flying horses too?

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

London Stock Market closes 2.8% Down.
German Stock Market closes 7% Down.
France Stock Market closes 8% Down.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

You mean like we were back in the seventies? As well as each time subsequent Governments agreed to change the rules, and aims of the original 'Common Market', without any consultation with the population? Only difference is that back then, it was the British Government doing the 'buggering', in tandem with the 'Eurocrats'. Many pigs in pokes have been sold as 'good for the country' in the last 40yrs.

 

John

We'll see. Time will tell who is right and who is wrong.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)

You mean like we were back in the seventies? As well as each time subsequent Governments agreed to change the rules, and aims of the original 'Common Market', without any consultation with the population? Only difference is that back then, it was the British Government doing the 'buggering', in tandem with the 'Eurocrats'. Many pigs in pokes have been sold as 'good for the country' in the last 40yrs.

 

John

 

The paper contained a yes or no box, on the bottom of the original ballot paper it contained the words in bold lettering right across the paper 'the common market'

 

That was the day the electorate were duped and sold a pig in the poke. Ever since then, I totally agree with you, both the u k governments and the e u worked in tandem to ignore the tax paying populist ideal and now they don't like it up 'em.

 

and those on the alleged far left and far right where classed as extremists on the right xenophobes. read that one recently

 

 

KIN TOUGH

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

All,

 

Once again I reluctantly agree with Gozzer. Regardless of what you hoped Sportsman, the post was/is a bigoted, strongly and unfairly pointing out the obvious effort required and is critical of other people, ideas, etc. THE GD VOTE IS OVER !!! what comes is what comes. Example, The US customs laws and tarriffs stand 13 ft on 11X17 inch paper. Every entry has to be changed. Mox Nix! We will no doubt do it.

 

Remember the massive bit of paperwork involved in Y2K? Nothing happened other than global warming. Hand wringing won't change anything now.

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted

All,

 

Once again I reluctantly agree with Gozzer.

Phone

 

Come on Phone, this is getting to be a habit, that must be at least three times in the last seven years!

You're spoiling my street cred' man. I know you said I was 'mellow' but even a 'cool, laid back dude' like me has his limits. :o

 

John.

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

For the last 40 years, UK law has been inextricably linked to EU Law.

All of the laws will have to be changed and there won't be time for them all to be passed through parliament so the Government / Civil Service will change them all without reference to anyone and they will be foisted on you, like it or not.

Anyone for democracy or freedom?

 

 

Na, the essence of u k law is that it's applied by consent.

 

The common market, federal superstate law does not know the meaning of it.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept