Jump to content

Hillary?

Dave H

By Dave H
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted (edited)

I wouldn't vote.

Couldn't live with myself voting either.

You could always vote Independent. They do have them you know.

Edited by corydoras

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Steve Walker
Steve Walker

Favourite tweet;   "If Hillary Clinton died of pneumonia and then came back to life as a zombie and then ate my family I would still vote for her over Trump"   https://twitter.com/blabdill/status/

corydoras
corydoras

I did not know that you were a fellow aficionado of Christopher Hitchens. You do know that Hitch hated quote miners with a vengeance?.   The bit where he says "don't waste my time it's bullshit" was

Vagabond
Vagabond

Every time a major issue is "decided" by a vote, the losers maintain the winners either fiddled the vote/ did not understand the issues/ were misled in some way cannot be trusted to make a rational de

chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

What I meant was I could understand Newt's reluctance to vote for Hillary. I would probably feel the same way.

However, I can't understand why anyone would consider Trump as Presidential material, ever.

like here .a great number vote for the opposition because they dont like the alternative ,worst are the morons that vote for parties even bigger ones vote for a party because their pappy did and they carry on the tradition

you hear it here often ,wont vote for the tory upperclass snobs because i am working class! the heads of the labour party are no different they are all bloody snobs with their heads in the trough ,why vote when you cant push a fag paper between them?

its time ballot papers had a box labled none of the above so we could save a few quid on tax giving them the lifestyles of kings ,oh my who would represent us you cry ,none of the ones in power give a flying **** about the voter until they need your vote again

 

there is one saving grace with trump "hopefully" hes not got many backers to pay back in kind if he gets in ,he can bugger up america all by himself

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

Don't believe the nonsense about funding himself. His companies are charging and taking money from the donations given to his campaign.

He is making money. If he were to win then the sky's the limit for how much the TRUMP organisation could get away with. How many government contracts would be headed their way?

The good news is that if he carries on the way he is going then he has no chance of winning. He may well destroy the Republican party in the process.

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

Don't believe the nonsense about funding himself. His companies are charging and taking money from the donations given to his campaign.

He is making money. If he were to win then the sky's the limit for how much the TRUMP organisation could get away with. How many government contracts would be headed their way?

The good news is that if he carries on the way he is going then he has no chance of winning. He may well destroy the Republican party in the process.

One can always hope.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

The good news is that if he carries on the way he is going then he has no chance of winning. Corbyn may well destroy the labour party in the process.

 

I have corrected it for you. :thumbs:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

Don't believe the nonsense about funding himself. His companies are charging and taking money from the donations given to his campaign.

He is making money. If he were to win then the sky's the limit for how much the TRUMP organisation could get away with. How many government contracts would be headed their way?

The good news is that if he carries on the way he is going then he has no chance of winning. He may well destroy the Republican party in the process.

I was referring to favours he would have to pay back in kind (no such thing as a free lunch) as clinton will if she gets in ,paying back yourself is part and parcel of business

We saw in a documentary the corruption of mrs simpson when she became mayor

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

Not sure what you mean mr Bush ,certainly anti establishment ,i have a great problem with people that have power over others and definitely anti herd in nature.but not sure what your getting at ,am i above what?

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept