Jump to content

Ban Beach Fishing

Elton

By Elton
in Sea Fishing

 Share

Recommended Posts

chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

as 1.8 million voters found out the gov care little for petitions so 11 will not register one jot :D

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vagabond Member

Vagabond

Posted
Posted
as 1.8 million voters found out the gov care little for petitions so 11 will not register one jot

 

 

They might not care about petitions, but to a man (and to a Blairbabe) they are control freaks.

 

An opportunity to ban something is too good to be missed - so what if they ban beachfishing, cite the petition as "public opinion" and have a soundbite/photoshoot spree, saying " There - we listened"

 

...as I said earlier, be careful what you wish for.....

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)
They might not care about petitions, but to a man (and to a Blairbabe) they are control freaks.

 

An opportunity to ban something is too good to be missed - so what if they ban beachfishing, cite the petition as "public opinion" and have a soundbite/photoshoot spree, saying " There - we listened"

 

...as I said earlier, be careful what you wish for.....

 

 

Somehow i think they just might need to get a few thousand more signitures before the alarm bells start ringing, however with the comedians getting in on the act i think this petition ain't long for this world.

 

fwiw I don't blame spongebob signing as i bet he is concerned with all those lead weight missiles dropping in on his head.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
maidstonemike Member

maidstonemike

Posted
Posted (edited)

Well I have to say, the anglers public image isn't good. When you hear of anglers casting at boats just because they are 'in the way' or swimmers because they are 'in the way, you can understand the reasoning behind banning beach angling.

Other water users have every right to be there, it's the anglers duty to take care and not endanger anyone using the water.

Then you see the piles of rubbish , dangerous rubbish sometimes, left on the beaches and piers, it reinforces the point.

Dog owners are banned on some beaches, so why not anglers for the same reason?

I was in West Bay Bridport a few weeks ago, and took a stroll along the harbour pier one night. About 7 anglers were fishing, the next morning I went back, only to find all their rubbish, newspaper used to hold the lug, bits of dirty rag, food wrappers and drink bottles.

if I were in charge of the pier, I would ban angling for sure.

Until anglers clean up their act and behave more responsibly, they are in danger of being banned.

As an angler myself, I am ashamed of the way some behave, and feel uncomfortable sometimes to be included amongst them when I'm fishing a public beach, and people glare at me, and probably assume I behave in the same way.

Edited by maidstonemike
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

Littering isn't exclusively an angler's vice. There's enough coastline for everyone to share, though I've seen windsurfers and jetskiers get close to my lines when they've had literally miles of empty beach to use. Bit of give and take from everyone required.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
Well I have to say, the anglers public image isn't good. When you hear of anglers casting at boats just because they are 'in the way' or swimmers because they are 'in the way, you can understand the reasoning behind banning beach angling.

Other water users have every right to be there, it's the anglers duty to take care and not endanger anyone using the water.

Then you see the piles of rubbish , dangerous rubbish sometimes, left on the beaches and piers, it reinforces the point.

Dog owners are banned on some beaches, so why not anglers for the same reason?

I was in West Bay Bridport a few weeks ago, and took a stroll along the harbour pier one night. About 7 anglers were fishing, the next morning I went back, only to find all their rubbish, newspaper used to hold the lug, bits of dirty rag, food wrappers and drink bottles.

if I were in charge of the pier, I would ban angling for sure.

Until anglers clean up their act and behave more responsibly, they are in danger of being banned.

As an angler myself, I am ashamed of the way some behave, and feel uncomfortable sometimes to be included amongst them when I'm fishing a public beach, and people glare at me, and probably assume I behave in the same way.

 

 

Not all bad news, this one does have some effect. Two years ago i was fishing off berry head devon and was disgusted with the amount of rubbish, this year it was spotless and the anglers down there often have voluntary meets to keep it so.

 

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s126/ba...i700hcpJPEG.jpg

 

I like this one as well.

 

http://i151.photobucket.com/albums/s126/ba...i700hcpJPEG.jpg

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept