Jump to content

Human rights.

Andrew

By Andrew
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

 

Because he would then have been previously tried for the offence, and wouldn't face a second prosecution for the same alleged crime?

We can prosecute you more than once as the rules changed some time ago (cannot remember the word we used to use) anyway if your not found guilty we now have the jewish system of doing it until you are

Another staple of the free world Habeas corpus also seems to have evapourated lately ,dont you just love that old terrorist threat excuse to remove freedom ,we start wars pointing fingers at regimes locking up folks for years with no trials ,using torture to get evidence ,generally abusing prisoners and throwing in a bit of genocide then do the exact same thing ourselves ,no wonder the fuzzy wuzzies get annoyed

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 156
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Newt
Newt

Hmmm - the locations specified in the original license which was granted by the UK government.   That would mean the UK government is guilty of a human rights violation which evidently makes you unf

John S
John S

Wasn't it nice of Tony Blair to start pushing human rights in Parliament just as Cherie was forming Matrix, a group of lawyers specialising in human rights issues....

corydoras
corydoras

Perhaps you could have a scan over the European Convention on Human Rights and post up here which ones should not apply to you John, which would you deny yourself and why?

Worms Member

Worms

Posted
Posted

It has nothing to do with the EU.

 

Simple really, some of the evidence used against him was obtained by torture.

Are you ok with torture used to gain evidence? Or or you happier with the more "traditional" Western values of a fair trial?

 

Which is it? One or the other.

He was found guilty of terror offences in his own country that has not signed up the the ECHR...what would you rather have, terroristss wandering around free or locked up in jail?

 

Where's the proof of torture anyway...it seems to be coming from a convicted terrorist and his mates. Now who would you believe, a convicted terrorist or a judge?

Eating wild caught fish is good for my health, reduces food miles and keeps me fit trying to catch them........it's my choice to do it, not yours to stop me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

Because he would then have been previously tried for the offence, and wouldn't face a second prosecution for the same alleged crime?

 

I'm sceptical of the idea that him serving a few years of easy time in a UK prison would lead the Jordanians to drop their desire to give him hard labour for the rest of his life.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
captain cojones Member

captain cojones

Posted
Posted

I'm sceptical of the idea that him serving a few years of easy time in a UK prison would lead the Jordanians to drop their desire to give him hard labour for the rest of his life.

Ive never been into a British prison, but the people i speak to who have, dispute the idea, (put forward by the media primarily) that they are "The easy life".

 

If he has committed offences in the UK, (and from what i can see he has)...Then prosecute him...I really cant see why they dont.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Worms Member

Worms

Posted
Posted

If he has committed offences in the UK, (and from what i can see he has)...Then prosecute him...I really cant see why they dont.

Allegedly because it would embarrass the security services who gave him a 'clean' bill of health (politically) when he originally came here!

Eating wild caught fish is good for my health, reduces food miles and keeps me fit trying to catch them........it's my choice to do it, not yours to stop me!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
captain cojones Member

captain cojones

Posted
Posted

Allegedly because it would embarrass the security services who gave him a 'clean' bill of health (politically) when he originally came here!

 

Sorry, but i think that is just nonsense. If someone has committed an offence then prosecute....

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted (edited)

He was found guilty of terror offences in his own country that has not signed up the the ECHR...what would you rather have, terroristss wandering around free or locked up in jail?

just goes to show how weak and lax, ineffective our borders are, let any convicted scum in and give them more than the protection offered to the uk guys who have paid their taxes all their life. it stinks and continues.

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/immigration/9252423/200-war-criminals-identified-by-Britain-but-only-three-deported.html

We seem to attract the scum of the earth unfortunately ,evem mp,s welcome warlords with open arms and even that thug mandella shook hands with the queen!

Mind you our government couldn't get their tongues further up isreals arse if they tried

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

Worms,

 

I may be coming around to your way of thinking.

 

The American Declaration of Independence built the case (including a "conviction") that because of King George III’s abuse of power there was no reasonable alternative to revolution. American's were dying because of his “abominable crimes”.

 

You would, by your argument since the King was found "guilty" in an American court, sent him to us - no questions ask. (?).

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept