Jump to content

and the winner is:

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

kirisute Member

kirisute

Posted
Posted

where is Fawkes when you need him??

kill the whole bally lot of 'em!!

then we build a HUGE navy and invade the world!! we buy our way into various countries we cant possibly beat with warfare...possibly using drugs or cunning financial blackmail...we then enslave the majority of the lands we have conquered and jobs a good 'un!!

 

oh hang on....we did that already...hmmmmmm

 

ok lets just kill the lot of 'em then!!

penrodadventuresweb.jpg
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 56
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

gozzer
gozzer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f4fQDAyl4GU       John.

Vagabond
Vagabond

I voted against joining the "Common Market" as it was then described , back in the 1970s   I recognised it then for the wolf in sheep's clothing that it really was. All subsequent progress towards

Sportsman
Sportsman

Sorry John The person I meant was possibly not the most hated PM in history but almost certainly the worst. Blair is the most hated, or at least ought to be by any right thinking person. The name of

ayjay Member

ayjay

Posted
Posted

I cannot get my head around why people vote for MEPs whose sole aim is to leave the EU.

Maybe they too want to leave the EU, maybe they never wanted to be in it in the first place and voted as such back in the 70s, maybe they see this as the beginning of possible progress towards that: no other party has come close to offering any such possibilities.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I cannot get my head around why people vote for MEPs whose sole aim is to leave the EU. I heard that about 30% of the new MEPs are anti EU. Is it because of the extortionate salaries they are getting whilst purporting to try and dismantle the parliament that is filling their coffers.

 

Ahh, here ya go, i'll help you out with your concern, nigel and I want you all sacked speech:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkT2YC1gim8

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

ohh dear the electorate are wrong and labour was right all the time, not to give the voters a chance of a referendum:

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-27585260

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vagabond Member

Vagabond

Posted
Posted

I voted against joining the "Common Market" as it was then described , back in the 1970s

 

I recognised it then for the wolf in sheep's clothing that it really was. All subsequent progress towards a fully grown wolf (United States of Europe) has been made by gravy-train oriented politicians without consulting the British electorate.

 

Interestingly, I have NEVER met anyone who admits to having voted "Yes" in that original referendum, so either:

 

1. I have a very anti-EU circle of acquaintances who all voted "No", or

2. Anyone who voted "Yes" is now ashamed to admit it, or

3.(forward you conspiracy theorists) The original vote was rigged.

 

I doubt if Farage would ever succeed in disentangling us from the EU, even if he got enough seats at Westminster to hold a balance of power, but the recent vote suggests there are lots of people who at least hope he might. It is up to Cameron to convince us that the Tories really mean business over sorting out the EU and then holding a referendum - that is the only realistic chance of us getting out.

 

Until now, pro-Europe debaters have adopted a patronising attitude towards those who want out, suggesting anti-EU campaigners "don't understand" international economics, whereas very often it was the other way round. That bluff has now been called. Clegg tried that argument with Farage and got a political bloody nose as a result.

  • Like 2

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vagabond Member

Vagabond

Posted
Posted

 

(Blair)

"You look underneath that UKIP facade and you see something pretty nasty and unpleasant,"

 

"Pot", "Kettle" and "Black" are three words that spring to mind,

 

The real reasons for Blair going to war in Iraq have yet to emerge, (if they ever will).

  • Like 1

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

The reason was his jewish masters told him to ,pretty why anything happens over there and countries ignore the 30 odd UN mandates against isreal but use the couple of UN mandates against other nearby countries as an excuse to invade

The "saviour" of the middle east got his job making pretty sure isreal got everything it wants ,sorr y 45 mandates

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_the_UN_resolutions_concerning_Israel_and_Palestine

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
poledark Member

poledark

Posted
Posted

Oh dear oh dear! Just to help you out a bit Dave, I voted to join and so did the majority if I remember it correctly.

 

I could say I know a few who are in favour of staying in, and as for the "patronising attitude" then perhaps you should reread your very patronising...indeed it could be termed insulting post. I am not a fool, who is easily lead, no more than all the millions who voted to join in the first place.

 

Living in a predomitably farming area I also meet a lot of farmers who are very happy to employ immigrants at very low wages, how they must agonise about leaving the EU and losing all that cheap labour :) I talked with one yesterday and asked him what he would do, and he said " I will diversify".........rip out the fruit trees and run sheep or cattle or even plough up and go arable, so either way he would still be "allright mate " just have to pay a bit more for your food (smug smile)

 

Den

I voted against joining the "Common Market" as it was then described , back in the 1970s

 

I recognised it then for the wolf in sheep's clothing that it really was. All subsequent progress towards a fully grown wolf (United States of Europe) has been made by gravy-train oriented politicians without consulting the British electorate.

 

Interestingly, I have NEVER met anyone who admits to having voted "Yes" in that original referendum, so either:

 

1. I have a very anti-EU circle of acquaintances who all voted "No", or

2. Anyone who voted "Yes" is now ashamed to admit it, or

3.(forward you conspiracy theorists) The original vote was rigged.

 

I doubt if Farage would ever succeed in disentangling us from the EU, even if he got enough seats at Westminster to hold a balance of power, but the recent vote suggests there are lots of people who at least hope he might. It is up to Cameron to convince us that the Tories really mean business over sorting out the EU and then holding a referendum - that is the only realistic chance of us getting out.

 

Until now, pro-Europe debaters have adopted a patronising attitude towards those who want out, suggesting anti-EU campaigners "don't understand" international economics, whereas very often it was the other way round. That bluff has now been called. Clegg tried that argument with Farage and got a political bloody nose as a result.

"When through the woods and forest glades I wanderAnd hear the birds sing sweetly in the trees;When I look down from lofty mountain grandeur,And hear the brook, and feel the breeze;and see the waves crash on the shore,Then sings my soul..................

for all you Spodders. https://youtu.be/XYxsY-FbSic

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted

snigger:

 

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10152282767912779&set=p.10152282767912779&type=1&theater

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept