Jump to content

A Nice Catch of Mullet

Leon Roskilly

By Leon Roskilly
in Conservation & Politics

 Share

Recommended Posts

stavey Member

stavey

Posted
Posted
Hello Stavey

Nobody has said that fishing is as good to day as it has ever been, some fisheries it is others it ain't.

If a solution was suggested that might be off use and is workable we would be more willing to listen, but mostly the knee jerk stupid ness that most forms of management , including most anything anglers come up with just ain't worth the time.

 

Wurzel your last line sums it up mate, commercials have no intention of working with anglers what so ever and it is all f**king pointless, i will carry on trying to catch the odd mullet amongst the gillnets and putting them back so a few to**ers can carry on killing them for a few pints eh, cheers very much........

I Fish For Sport Not Me Belly

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 239
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

steve good Member

steve good

Posted
Posted
Hi Steve

 

I'd vote for Mickey Mouse before I voted for the liar and the highwayman we've got in power now.

 

Hi Steve

 

At least UKIP want out of Europe, that would be better than what we have now

 

:thumbs:

 

MAYBE we might have had a moment here together, did we just agree on something, for the first time, not sure myself

 

:thumbs:

 

steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
Hi Steve

 

At least UKIP want out of Europe, that would be better than what we have now

 

:thumbs:

 

MAYBE we might have had a moment here together, did we just agree on something, for the first time, not sure myself

 

:thumbs:

 

steve

Ahhhh bless, I think i might agree with that as well. :hug:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Coppolo Member

Steve Coppolo

Posted
Posted
Hi Steve

 

At least UKIP want out of Europe, that would be better than what we have now

 

:thumbs:

 

MAYBE we might have had a moment here together, did we just agree on something, for the first time, not sure myself

 

:thumbs:

 

steve

 

Hi Steve

Nah, we agreed on a few things last year too mate. Anyway, I've heard you can get tablets for it :thumbs:

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
Hi Steve

Nah, we agreed on a few things last year too mate. Anyway, I've heard you can get tablets for it :thumbs:

 

 

OHHHHHHHHHHHH poooooey, i'll stay out of this one then. :boxing::black_eye::whistling:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ColinW Member

ColinW

Posted
Posted

I agree that arguing with commercial fishermen is as pointless as trying to teach a pig to dance. As long as there is something edible to kill and sell commercial fishermen will be happy. They don't care if they have to go further and further down the marine food chain to find it. They know their kids won't be fishermen so who cares if the seas are all but barren in twenty years?

Politicians on the other hand can quite easily do the sum:

1,500,000 angling votes gained minus 15,000 commercial fishing vote lost equals another four years with my snout in the trough!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stavey Member

stavey

Posted
Posted
Hi Steve

 

At least UKIP want out of Europe, that would be better than what we have now

 

:thumbs:

 

MAYBE we might have had a moment here together, did we just agree on something, for the first time, not sure myself

 

:thumbs:

 

steve

 

Hello steve g

 

How do you feel about the historicle rights mularkey, are you happy for the french/belgiums to come inside the 12 mile right up to the 6 and suck up all the bass you will not be allowed to catch under 40cm after april? if not as an rsa it would be a nice change to agree with a commercial on atleast this one thing, and who knows it made lead to actually lobbying together for something that would benefit both, it would be a first!! or is the thought of such a thing unthinkable? cheers..........

I Fish For Sport Not Me Belly

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wurzel Member

wurzel

Posted
Posted
Hello steve g

 

How do you feel about the historicle rights mularkey, are you happy for the french/belgiums to come inside the 12 mile right up to the 6 and suck up all the bass you will not be allowed to catch under 40cm after april? if not as an rsa it would be a nice change to agree with a commercial on atleast this one thing, and who knows it made lead to actually lobbying together for something that would benefit both, it would be a first!! or is the thought of such a thing unthinkable? cheers..........

 

 

Hello Stavey

 

I doubt there is much that can be done short of all out war over the historic rights issue. It would be nice if we were all fishing to the same rules though. We all know that the French are a law unto them selves and again not much short of a war will change them.

 

I think Steve G has already done a bit of lobbying in that direction.

I fish to live and live to fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
steve good Member

steve good

Posted
Posted

Exactly what i was saying isnt it 'commercials say they dont cause pressure on fish stocks' 'anything anglers suggest is sh1t'

 

Why not take yer ball home ?

 

Newsflash guys, fishing puts pressure on fish stocks (commercial or otherwise) and we have to work together whether some of us like it or not.

[/quot

 

hi roryh

Stop the the front page!!!!!!!!! UKIP win the election and pull the uk out of europe, fishing limits return to pre-commen market time, can all uk stakeholders sort out our fisheries like Iceland did?????????????????????????????????????????????????

 

steve

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept