Jump to content

c'mon Anglersnet, really ?

Andy_1984

By Andy_1984
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

Andy_1984 Member

Andy_1984

Posted
Posted

Ok time for me to have a moan about skimwords. A few times ive been duped into clicking on a link I think is from the original poster :nono:

 

I understand all too well the need to make money from the site im not moaning about advertising, but imo changing peoples content to include a link on something they have said is a big no no and a little shady and underhanded if I may be so blunt.

 

just check this:

 

post-7003-0-09389900-1434812779_thumb.png

 

4 words converted to ads in steve walkers post and 3 in steve burkes and sportsmans posts too.

 

Again I dont mind ads just the way its been done here because ive clicked on a few :thumbdown:

Owner of Tacklesack.co.uk


Moderator at The-Pikers-Pit.co.uk

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

I never see them either but a 7" screen is a bit small to see much of anything ,i use mobile version the desktop view is better but typing is so retarded its not easy to do on the playbook

Mobile version ,no smilies no nothkng

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
Posted

Always on my screen also Andy, does get a bit annoying at times.

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Vagabond Member

Vagabond

Posted
Posted

I was plagued for a short time, but since investing in Malwarebytes the problem has gone away.

 

 

RNLI Governor

 

World species 471 : UK species 105 : English species 95 .

Certhia's world species - 215

Eclectic "husband and wife combined" world species 501

 

"Nothing matters very much, few things matter at all" - Plato

...only things like fresh bait and cold beer...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

 

 

Errm wot adverts

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ayjay Member

ayjay

Posted
Posted

Those links (as shown in 1st post) are not showing up here.

 

Adblock Plus and NoScript may have something to do with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept