Child poverty +

[Steve Walker]

coupe with 3 kids on tax credits will be £2000 A YEAR WORSE OFF

Is that including the change to make tax credits apply only to the first two kids?

[barry luxton]

 

Durex = responsible parents.

 

living within your means = durex

 

child poverty = withdrawal method, perhaps.

[Dave H]

How do you tell a catholic couple on benefits they must use contriception as there is no mention of 'Mates' or similar products in the bible?

[barry luxton]

How do you tell a catholic couple on benefits they must use contriception as there is no mention of 'Mates' or similar products in the bible?

bible is out of date, same as other 'religions'

[kirisute]

How do you tell a catholic couple on benefits they must use contriception as there is no mention of 'Mates' or similar products in the bible?

I would suggest telling them to start taking responsibility for their own existence instead of assuming a higher power will justify their lack of foresight and forgive them their sins!!

religion causes enough issues without relying on its bullcrap to justify breeding a tribe or welfare fed brats that will leech money!

 

as horrible as some might find it I truly believe you should be able to prove you can afford a child before you are allowed to have one!

China averted an estimated 200 million mouths to feed between '70 and '09!!

but what do we get instead.."human rights do gooders"!! yep theres that phrase again...foolish people who cant see beyond the "human rights" of someone....not thinking that the human rights of bringing in a tribe of welfare state children will considerably effect the "human rights" of an entire society in the long run!

 

when society itself starts to collapse because of the "rights" of people that are a drain upon that society without adding sufficiently back to it then that society will fail to remain stable!

 

there is no single answer...the rich will always feed hand to mouth themselves and their peers.....the poor will always assume it is their human right to be supported by a society regardless of if they have, or do, contribute to that society.

 

the UK society, as it stands right now, will not survive. it cannot...

Edited July 9, 2015 by kirisute

[big_cod]

Durex = responsible parents.

 

living within your means = durex

 

child poverty = withdrawal method, perhaps.

 

So what about people who have allready got kids what a stupid anser i wonder if osborn will last the term he will be branded the money snatcher it will stick like glue the public will not forget this one he was intetviewed this morning and dodged the questions very badly the mans a dick.

 

paul.

[kirisute]

So what about people who have allready got kids what a stupid anser i wonder if osborn will last the term he will be branded the money snatcher it will stick like glue the public will not forget this one he was intetviewed this morning and dodged the questions very badly the mans a dick.

 

paul.

if you think for one moment that anything the "public thinks" about any of the politicians will have any effect what so fekking ever on whether they stay or go or keep shafting us royally up the arse then I think your sadly mistaken!

the last time the public had any great effect on parliament was when Fawkes screwed blowing the buggers up!

 

they are in their jobs for themselves...always have been, always will be...our "democracy" is nothing more than a sham system where "we" are foolish enough to believe our votes or choices have power.

there can be no democracy until the general populace have the power to utterly vote no confidence in ANY political group!

and whilst the Royal parasite corpse sits upon her golden throne and leaves it in line for her tribe of "celebrity royals" the public will never have the power to vote "no confidence"

Edited July 9, 2015 by kirisute

[Steve Walker]

RE existing children;

Another decision that most families make is how many children they have, conscious that each extra child costs the family more. In the current tax credit system, each extra child brings an additional payment of £2,780 a year. It’s important to support families, but it’s also important to be fair to the many working families who don’t see their budgets rise by anything like that when they have more children

 

So this is the balance we will strike: In future we will limit the support provided through tax credits and Universal Credit to two children. Families who have a third or subsequent child after April 2017 will not receive additional Tax Credit or UC support for this child.

 

Support provided to families who make a new claim to Universal Credit after this date will also be limited to two children. And we will make similar changes in Housing Benefit too. There will be provisions for exceptional cases including multiple births. In addition, those starting a family after April 2017 will no longer be eligible for the family element in Tax Credits.

 

Nor will new births and new claims be eligible for the first child premium in Universal Credit. We will make similar changes in Housing Benefit, by removing the family premium for children born or claims made after April 2016. This approach means no family sees a cash loss. And as promised, child benefit will be maintained. These changes to Tax Credits are not easy but they are fair, and they return tax credit spending to the level it was in 2007-08 in real terms.

April 2017 = 9 months hence.

[Steve Walker]

Must admit, I did not realise exactly how generous the tax credit system is; I didn't realise that a minimum wage earner with two kids was on the same take-home as a childless person on £24250.

 

[big_cod]

Just been announced on BBC news 13 million families to lose out with tax credit cuts there is uproar and low wage families hit the worst a perfect home goal for osborn and it showed that horrible lump of - - - - Ian Duncan smith cheering horrible man.



Paul

Edited July 9, 2015 by big_cod