Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.


barry luxton

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38


Recommended Posts

As long as the international sprout market isnt effected i am fine

 

I am more concerned trying to get a mysterious stain out of my folding silicone cup ,its resisting all chemicals known to man ,i blame the EU banning all chemicals known to man!

Edited by chesters1
  • Like 1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Britain’s central bank has warned that the risks posed by the Brexit vote are “starting to crystallise”.

In it latest financial stability report, just released, the Bank of England warns that:

The BoE has also taken action to fight the looming threat of recession, by relaxing the capital control rules on UK banks.

“There is evidence that some risks have begun to crystallise. The current outlook for UK financial stability is challenging,”

That is meant to encourage lenders to keep providing credit to the UK economy.

Back in March, the BoE has announced that the so-called counter-cyclical capital buffer would rise to 0.5%. It has now reversed that decision, potentially freeing up an extra £150bn for lending, the BoE said.

And the Bank also pledged to do more to help the economy, saying:

“The Financial Policy Committee stands ready to take actions that will ensure that capital and liquidity buffers can be drawn on as needed, to support the supply of credit and in support of market functioning.”

 

 

sterling has also hit a two-and-a-half-year low against the euro, at €1.1787

 

Sterling slides to new 31-year low vs dollar at $1.3117, down 12% since Brexit vote. That’s below the levels hit after the referendum vote, and back to the sterling crisis of the mid-1980s.

 

UK Services #PMI returned to 38-month low in June. Survey period covered Brexit vote after which "loss of momentum intensified".

 

Picture of leave effect starting to show - important services sector slowed in June, although it didn't contract like construction did

And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

The end of the world is nigh....were all fekced...better get your bunkers built as the zombie apocalypse will soon take place!!

 

Make sure you panic buy and empty the bread shelves lol.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great thing is that when you bend over and stick your head in the sand you are in the perfect position for what comes next :bigemo_harabe_net-163:

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How man times do we have to say, nobody in their right mind thought it would be plain sailing after the vote. It's been 12 days for crying out loud, all this childish gloating is only making any split even wider. Everything I've read has said that the value of the pound has been unrealistically high, and it's devaluation will help ease the transition. Even Standard and Poor have said that we should be able to ride out the initial 'panic' without going into a recession, providing the Government and BoE, act to 'steady the ship'.

 

The vote has been taken, the result is in, why not accept it, and work together for the future? Or is there some perverse pleasure to be had by trying to goad those who thought differently?

 

This is really showing the size of the divide between sections of this country, sadly it's even bigger than I thought.

 

John.

Edited by gozzer
  • Like 2

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John, you forgot childish insults on your list. e5002350.gif

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The governor of the bank of England is not doing childish gloating. No point sticking fingers in ears and just going lalalalalalalalala. I'm not gloating, I'm really really worried and it blows my mind that people can be so blase. I don't have to pretend to myself that this was actually a good idea. But I do agree that the divide this has exposed is extremely deep. There's not really any common ground. We're now effectively in separate countries - The Economist has called them the metropolitan and the backwaters. No comment from me.

And those who were seen dancing were thought to be insane by those who could not hear the music

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Piece about the future from a so-called expert: http://speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2016/07/04/breaking-up-is-hard-to-do/

Hah, what does he know. A bloke down the pub told me that there is no problem an I know what I would rather believe.

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The great thing is that when you bend over and stick your head in the sand you are in the perfect position for what comes next :bigemo_harabe_net-163:

 

 

really, go look at how france spain and Italy are 'getting on' in the financial world they are over and above the e u financial constraints, on their uppers, like I have said previous, sell your u k assets and bugger off to spain, I'm sure you will be very happy wallowing, bye bye you won't be missed, or your pathetic gobshiet won't be missed, slagging off the u k. :bye1::bye1::bye1: :bye1: :bye1:

Edited by barry luxton

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.