Jump to content

No Sea Angling Licence


Elton

Recommended Posts

Couple of interesting news releases just added to our news section!

 

http://www.anglersnet.co.uk/News/

Anglers' Net Shopping Partners - Please Support Your Forum

CLICK HERE for all your Amazon purchases - books, photography equipment, DVD's and more!

CLICK HERE for Go Outdoors. HUGE discounts!

 

FOLLOW ANGLERS' NET ON TWITTER- CLICK HERE - @anglersnet

PLEASE 'LIKE' US ON FACEBOOK - CLICK HERE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 51
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

After what he did to the bass MLS plans as practically his first ministerial action my mistrust of Mr Shaw is so great that I'll have to read the draft proposals before I believe anything he says!

So far we haven't had one sprat thrown in our direction, while he seems to bend over backwards at the slightest whinge of the commercial fishermen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

After what he did to the bass MLS plans as practically his first ministerial action my mistrust of Mr Shaw is so great that I'll have to read the draft proposals before I believe anything he says!

So far we haven't had one sprat thrown in our direction, while he seems to bend over backwards at the slightest whinge of the commercial fishermen.

 

I think you can believe what he says simply because he never said he would keep the bass mls deal. :rolleyes:

 

However until the marine bill is cast in granite I to have sever reservations about the final outcome.

 

Being a tadge on the cynical side :rolleyes: maybe the current world fiscal problems may result in a penny wise government grasping an area of income which with a little bit of common sense and not a lot of money could be a good investment i.e. the Golden Mile. :rolleyes::D

 

Just trying to find a rainbow somewhere :lol::lol:

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Great News.

 

Funny to see the NFSA and SACN press releases claiming its their victory. If they hadn't dreampt it up in the first place there would have been no problem. This is a victory for all those who contacted their MP's and attended those meetings. Word got back about the feeling on the ground and DEFRA had no other option. It could have cost labour the next election.

 

This in no way signifies the end though, so dont be fooled into a false sense of security. Sea angling still faces many battles. Closed zones (like the one proposed for Flamborough), Bag limits, and bait digging restrictions are still on the cards.

 

My thoughts on a bag limit.

 

1. Its an erosion of man's right to catch and take fish with a rod and line.

2. It could spell the end for charter fishing, fishing clubs and fishing festivals.

3. Everytime ICES research shows an increase in fish stocks (even a very slight one) DEFRA simply hand extra quota to the commercial fishermen - letting them take those extra fish in the next year. This years 10% cod quota increase and increase in days at sea is a direct outcome of last years ICES advice that the cod breeding stock had slightly increased. DEFRA know full well where the blame lies for fish decline but they fail to sort that out, giving us bag limits just hands the extra few fish to the local trawler fleet. Is a no win situation.

 

So its a good result but don't be fooled into thinking they have gone away, because they haven't and we need to be very vigilant and keep an eye on the next trick they have up their sleeves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, unenforceable, unpopular, unlikely, and I was right.

Now they don't have to ban trawlers from inshore waters, they don't have to improve the angling , how were they going to do that?

They don't have to provide improved facilities for anglers.

They don't have to upset the commercial fishermen.

I think they probably feel that they are off the hook.

Edited by maidstonemike
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I said, unenforceable, unpopular,

 

http://www.fishupdate.com/news/fullstory.p...ence_move_.html

 

It has upset the shell fish association. Don't know why, it had s@d all to do with them.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is good news, but take a step back and look at exactly what has happened. As Glenn said, it's a victory for anglers, and it's thanks to those who made the Minister think again by expressing their views on the licence. Well done to everyone who wrote letters, initiated and signed petitions, attended Defra's roadshow meetings, posting their views on the forums, etc, etc. But let's not get carried away. We've gained absolutely nothing. The government have just removed a threat that they put there in the first place, and are now trying to give the imnpression that they've given us something. They haven't. Taking away their threat of a sea angling tax has done nothing to improve our fishing. As you are all aware, they have been known to do this sort of thing before, i.e, create a threat so that they can take it away and give the impression that they've given something worthwhile. Now that the licence has gone away, (for a while), look out for all the other rubbish contained within the RSA strategy that will still be heading our way.

 

We can't relax yet.

Edited by Steve Coppolo

DRUNK DRIVERS WRECK LIVES.

 

Don't drink and drive.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A victory for sea anglers in this country sense prevails . :clap2:

 

Quote

 

Labour’s Angling Spokesman Martin Salter MP has backed Fisheries Minister Jonathan Shaw in his decision not to proceed with a sea angling rod licence at the present time.

 

And Quote

 

Mr Salter said:

 

“Whilst I remain committed to the principle of a rod licence for all forms of recreational fishing"

 

 

 

I don't see that any thing has changed, it's just political speak saying they have just changed the agenda a bit but the out come will be the same and the time scale is still within their vision for angling.

I fish to live and live to fish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny to see the NFSA and SACN press releases claiming its their victory. If they hadn't dreampt it up in the first place there would have been no problem.
- Glenn

 

I'm sorry matey, but that's total crap! <_<

 

Anyway -

 

Statement from Jonathan Shaw:

 

I met sea angling representatives at the Angling summit on 18 February where a number of concerns were raised with me regarding the introduction of a chargeable licence for sea angling. I have also discussed the issue direct with anglers around the coast, as have my officials. In view of the concerns expressed, including the extent to which sea anglers expected to see benefits from the charge, I have decided not to proceed with enabling powers in the Marine Bill to introduce a sea angling licence.

 

I will, none the less, continue with a package of other measures that aim to provide benefits for anglers, including a review of nursery areas for the protection of bass stocks and of inshore netting, and a pilot study on area-based restrictions to support sea angling. I have also recently announced measures to increase protection of tope, a key species for anglers.

 

:clap:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.