E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

[big_cod]

Arent we near on in full employment while being the EU which way would you like it barry !!

 

 

 

 

 

Personally out and away from suckling the e u's political tit, that carries too many caveats. don't forget the e u are buying jobs at the mo by pumping in 30 billion euros per month after they pumped in 60 billion per month for a period of two years.

So out at any cost then bas they seem to be queuing to do the same not giving a dam about the consequences to others with brexit but I think one two will start shouting very loud very shortly.

 

And those poor football supporters when they find out no more euros and thats what we voted for hell what was I thinking about the best part they wont even realise it :

Edited November 28, 2017 by big_cod

[chesters1]

I read somewhere that 80% of browns jobs for brits went to foreigners and i have no doubt any jobs the tories create will do the same so losing jobs may not have the same impact if most are foreigners

[Huge_Vitae]

The lawyers always rake it in ,sometime ago i read it was over 30 million for consultations for the stonehenge tunnel?

And no doubt lots of money and brown envelopes are passing hands with the continual bickering over the farnham building plot ,must be ten years now

Worse still regarding Stonehenge was the ignored opinion of Road Transport Engineers whom, in the early days advised the vast majority of congestion could be removed if a fence or screen of Trees were to be placed at the side of the A303 stopping people from rubbernecking, couldn't have even tried it out because it would only cost a few thousand quid and no lawyers would make money.

[barry luxton]

Huge_Vitae, on 28 Nov 2017 - 21:04, said:

Worse still regarding Stonehenge was the ignored opinion of Road Transport Engineers whom, in the early days advised the vast majority of congestion could be removed if a fence or screen of Trees were to be placed at the side of the A303 stopping people from rubbernecking, couldn't have even tried it out because it would only cost a few thousand quid and no lawyers would make money.

 

 

Turn it into a toll road, job done.

[chesters1]

Worse still regarding Stonehenge was the ignored opinion of Road Transport Engineers whom, in the early days advised the vast majority of congestion could be removed if a fence or screen of Trees were to be placed at the side of the A303 stopping people from rubbernecking, couldn't have even tried it out because it would only cost a few thousand quid and no lawyers would make money.

Not sure why people would rubber neck ,its not impressive in the slightest ,smaller than expected and mostly a victorian idea and reconstruction of what they thought it looked like in use .

The Druids (ha ha) make me laugh theres almost nothing written down about them and what is is long after the event so hearsay.

Strange how some prat can call himself some stupid name dress in white and somehow gets reconition as the leader of what is a load of ****s ,the church maybe but druids lol

Edited November 28, 2017 by chesters1

[barry luxton]

 

Worse still regarding Stonehenge was the ignored opinion of Road Transport Engineers whom, in the early days advised the vast majority of congestion could be removed if a fence or screen of Trees were to be placed at the side of the A303 stopping people from rubbernecking, couldn't have even tried it out because it would only cost a few thousand quid and no lawyers would make money.

 

Went there about a year ago and was mugged of a fiver to enter the car park where you pay even more money to get on a bus to go to the stones. A fiver was enough for me, never to return.

 

Now I understand the rubber neckers, they too don't want to pay.

Edited November 28, 2017 by barry luxton

[Huge_Vitae]

Double standards you have just done the exact same thing .

Bloody Ignoramous, As said before, The involvement in Syria and Libya were NATO missions at the bequest of the LAWFUL GOVERNMENTS of those Countries, Kofi Annan said, regarding the Invasion of Iraq,"From our (UN) point of view the Invasion of Iraq was outside of the charter and therefore was illegal," now go back to reading your comic books and your 'IF', 'COULD' and 'MIGHT' happen arguments, well, not even your own thoughts.

[chesters1]

Pull it down i say and blame brexit ,cod would! If he stubbed his toe brexiters did it and the tories didnt warn them they may

I expect if a seagull shits on his little boat he blames ,may ,the tories and brexit

We should drag up the pathetic corbyn the saviour of the world and friend to unions just for a laugh

Edited November 28, 2017 by chesters1

[big_cod]

Bloody Ignoramous, As said before, The involvement in Syria and Libya were NATO missions at the bequest of the LAWFUL GOVERNMENTS of those Countries, Kofi Annan said, regarding the Invasion of Iraq,"From our (UN) point of view the Invasion of Iraq was outside of the charter and therefore was illegal," now go back to reading your comic books and your 'IF', 'COULD' and 'MIGHT' happen arguments, well, not even your own thoughts.

So Cameron had nothing to with the Causing the Libya invasion my arse which comic book you being reading beano !!

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/libya-report-britain-uk-gaddafi-civil-war-david-cameron-responsible-terrorism-isis-al-qaeda-mali-a7309821.html

Edited November 28, 2017 by big_cod

[chesters1]

Posting your links to lies again?