Jump to content

Will Donald trump last

big_cod

By big_cod
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

corydoras, on 10 Feb 2017 - 15:53, said:

Difficult one this. In my opinion Taiwan is on the wrong side of that red line. I have emotional attachments to Taiwan and the Taiwanese people.

 

 

Why don't you nip over there and organise a dads army mk 2 to stand up to the bullying Chinese. Lots of the left wing liberal ilk holding wooden rifles facing their aggression, bet you wooden go. :thumbs:

 

Or could it be when push comes to shove you really will insist on the good old uncle sam for your protection. :giveup:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Just reported, remember you heard it here folks.   Secret Service Agents responding to a call of suspicious behaviour have detained a male attempting to climb the Whitehouse Security Fence.   He h

*Ant*
*Ant*
Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Trumpy at Andrews giving his last speech as President, how many people would have predicted that five years ago. He still seems to be casting doubt on the legitimacy of the election despite so ma

Posted Images

Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
Posted

Trump is going to rewrite the order on his failed attempt to stop people from certain country's getting into the US the country is in disarray split right down the middle .

 

 

According to some news reports its not Paul, Most of the protests are from the usual loud mouthed minority section of the country.

 

Why do the minority always have the biggest damned mouths ?

  • Like 2

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)
The usual sore loser huff ,must be bad having all those millions of loans needing paying back hubby will have to do more talking to top up her pin money ,woops better put in a link it seems to make posts truthful in some eyes

[url=http://nypost.com/2016/12/09/hillary-clintons-losing-campaign-cost-a-record-1-2b/]http://nypost.com/2016/12/09/hillary-clintons-losing-campaign-cost-a-record-1-2b/[/url

Shes going to be down loans r us flogging her pearls as we speak

Edited by chesters1
  • Like 1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

The usual sore loser huff ,must be bad having all those millions of loans needing paying back hubby will have to do more talking to top up her pin money ,woops better put in a link it seems to make posts truthful in some eyes

http://nypost.com/2016/12/09/hillary-clintons-losing-campaign-cost-a-record-1-2b/'>http://nypost.com/2016/12/09/hillary-clintons-losing-campaign-cost-a-record-1-2b/[/url][/url][/url

Shes going to be down loans r us flogging her pearls as we speak

A lot of cash what I did notice was trump put 66 million of his OWN cash into his campaign brand trump CASH !! He will probably get 10 times that back how being president you know what they say speculate to accumulate money makes money . Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

A lot of cash what I did notice was trump put 66 million of his OWN cash into his campaign brand trump CASH !! He will probably get 10 times that back how being president you know what they say speculate to accumulate money makes money .

Only a fool wouldnt recoup a loss but using his money means he wont be giving back handers to those that 'lend' (who lends millions without wanting something in return?) Money to people ,not sure how much of her money clinton used but at least she wont be looking "favourably" on some people .

We have the same here ,anyone that supports the parties get favours or if they know to much about what goes on behind the scenes to keep them quiet a comfy seat in the lords is found

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

chesters1, on 11 Feb 2017 - 11:04, said:

Only a fool wouldnt recoup a loss but using his money means he wont be giving back handers to those that 'lend' (who lends millions without wanting something in return?) Money to people ,not sure how much of her money clinton used but at least she wont be looking "favourably" on some people .

We have the same here ,anyone that supports the parties get favours or if they know to much about what goes on behind the scenes to keep them quiet a comfy seat in the lords is found

 

Ahh yes, prime example:

 

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknews/david-camerons-cronies-attempt-to-receive-honours-in-secret/ar-AAmOLWg?li=BBoPWjQ&ocid=ieslice

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

Trump not returning favours?

Really?

Have you seen his cabinet?

Try Betsy de Voss.

Her position cost 200 million alone.

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

Emma two,

 

I'm afraid the "form" you used to know is gone. In the past, regardless of the outcome of our political choices American VOTERS have been thought of as a pretty level headed lot. I'm afraid, as a nation, we've lost our political position as the voice of reason.

 

President Trump is more adversarial than darn near all others presidents combined. For example, he is or has been involved in at least 4,000 legal actions in federal and state courts during the past three decades.

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept