Jump to content

Madeleine

Cranfield

By Cranfield
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 319
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

jeepster Member

jeepster

Posted
Posted
Spoken like a true media man :rolleyes:

 

Sounds like your journalist friend has all the answers. perhaps you should name him, tell us what ''National Broadcaster'' he works for so we can all finally get all the truth, and so end all this speculation about the case.

But of course you wont I suppose because journalists and the media they work for are not intersted in the truth, just personal Kudos, and newspaper sales.

 

I obviously couldn't possibly comment, but the initials of the national broadcaster are something akin to the broken biscuit corporation, the journalist's name is irrelevant, and believe me, he's no friend. Quite how you associate newspaper sales, or personal kudos with what I posted in my previous thread I'm not sure, as far as I can see, no newspapers will sell more copies based on it, and as far as personal kudos goes, as I didn't name the guy, and you all know I dont give a **** what you think of me, that arguement doesn't really hold water.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ken Davison South Wales Member

Ken Davison South Wales

Posted
Posted

Getting back to the thread :whistling:

 

It was stated that from the restraunt to the appartment was fifty yards, this now turns out to be one hundred yards, it was also stated that the appartment could be seen, the picture below leaves some doubt over that statement.

 

_44104522_map.jpg

I fish, I catches a few, I lose a few, BUT I enjoys. Anglers Trust PM

 

eat.gif

 

http://www.petalsgardencenter.com

 

Petals Florist

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ayjay Member

ayjay

Posted
Posted
............................ it was also stated that the apartment could be seen, the picture below leaves some doubt over that statement.

 

I did mention that back on page 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
deanbmw Member

deanbmw

Posted
Posted

its the first time ive comented on this thread but i will say what everyone else I know is saying and has said from the start.

"Guilty as Sin", "The pair have been to calm from start to finish".

 

Ive never had much sympathy for the pair of them, if it were some single parent who this had happend to they would have the other kids taken off them for neglect.

 

Quote from the Sunday Times:-

The couple are considering bringing lawyers from the UK to assist their Portuguese adviser, though they are frustrated that they will not be allowed to use any of the £800,000 in the Madeleine Fund to pay their legal bills.

 

“It seems like a disaster that we’ve got this huge donated fund and now we’re not allowed to use it for legal costs because we’re under suspicion,” he said.

 

What a shame......What a W***ER

Never test the depth of water with both feet.

Stuff work go fishing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted
McCanns returning to UK this morning.

 

Flying with Easyjet :wacko:

 

Should they not start avoiding the Media attentions?

That flight is going to be full of the Media, they must be insane.

 

Just wondering why it's now appropriate to return, i thought they was staying out there to find thier daughter. It couldn't be that they are no longer on friendly terms with the police could it.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Rabbit

Guest Rabbit

Posted
Posted
McCanns returning to UK this morning.

 

Flying with Easyjet :wacko:

 

Should they not start avoiding the Media attentions?

That flight is going to be full of the Media, they must be insane.

 

Thats just the point, they are not hiding from the media, because they believe they have got nothing to hide.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest Rabbit

Guest Rabbit

Posted
Posted
its the first time ive comented on this thread but i will say what everyone else I know is saying and has said from the start.

"Guilty as Sin", "The pair have been to calm from start to finish".

 

Ive never had much sympathy for the pair of them, if it were some single parent who this had happend to they would have the other kids taken off them for neglect.

 

Quote from the Sunday Times:-

The couple are considering bringing lawyers from the UK to assist their Portuguese adviser, though they are frustrated that they will not be allowed to use any of the £800,000 in the Madeleine Fund to pay their legal bills.

 

“It seems like a disaster that we’ve got this huge donated fund and now we’re not allowed to use it for legal costs because we’re under suspicion,” he said.

 

What a shame......What a W***ER

 

Because they have shown restraint in not cracking up that makes them Guilty As Sin does it? We dont know how they cope away from the public gaze, but it really must be hell for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted (edited)
Because they have shown restraint in not cracking up that makes them Guilty As Sin does it? We dont know how they cope away from the public gaze, but it really must be hell for them.
IMO they have brought this on themselves, they have sown the media wind and now must reap the media wirlwind. If the McCanns had left their children alone in Mrs McCann's native Scotland the chances are that one or both would be behind bars for neglect, and their children taken into care. Edited by corydoras

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept