Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

barry luxton

By barry luxton
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38

Recommended Posts

Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

ALL,

Point of order.

[rail] Privatization [1997] has been a success: 1.65 billion rail journeys are made annually, more than double the number before privatization, while the volume of freight carried on the railways is up 80% since privatization. [2017]

The rail industry employs 115,000 people and supports another 250,000 through its supply chain. In [2016], there were 1.718 billion journeys on the National Rail network, making the British network the fifth most used in the world (Note: Great Britain ranks 23rd in world population).

Phone

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 10.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • big_cod

    2467

  • chesters1

    1900

  • barry luxton

    1362

  • Ken L

    996

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Dales
Dales

I have always been Pro Europe and despite not liking a lot of the silly rules and regulations that comes with membership I always thought that the general idea of membership is a good thing.   Howev

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Far better to have a frog in your throat for a year or so than the French, Germans and a few others shafting you in the ass for decades to come. Oh look Ethel, a short post.

chesters1
chesters1

Cheap scallops?

Posted Images

big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted (edited)
16 minutes ago, Phone said:

ALL,

Point of order.

[rail] Privatization [1997] has been a success: 1.65 billion rail journeys are made annually, more than double the number before privatization, while the volume of freight carried on the railways is up 80% since privatization. [2017]

The rail industry employs 115,000 people and supports another 250,000 through its supply chain. In [2016], there were 1.718 billion journeys on the National Rail network, making the British network the fifth most used in the world (Note: Great Britain ranks 23rd in world population).

Phone

If you can call overcrowding sky high train fares trains that don’t run on time a success. ? Remember-its 2020  not 1920’ we are 6 th biggest economy in the world people need to commute to get to work most have no choice but to travel by train .Recent surveys with commuters who use the railways says the complete opposite to what you have stated phone and they are the people who use the trains day in day out so I think who I know who I would believe.

In a nutshell .

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/aug/03/britain-world-beater-ripping-off-citizens-rail-fares-water-energy-bills

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 hours ago, big_cod said:

Ever thought about bad management remember the record I am a 1 in 10 unemployment under Margeret thatcher it’s all history Chester’s Nissan one of most successful company’s  in British history all under union recognition throws your  argument under the bus. It’s history but we are now about to turn  the clocks 50 years with brexit when there was just 1 car parked in the street now there are dozens of them. Very strange  all since we have been a member of the Europe Union all the people on here who own there own homes all while we have been a membership of the European Union .We have all done so badly and now it looks like turning the clock back to the 70s 1 car parked on the  whole street mind the air will be cleaner .

 

Bad management, the e u are legendary for that one, why are they needed sport?

 

the e u didn't buy our home, nor did it pay the mortgage , nor did it force us up a 6 each morning for the daily grind to go to work. Nor did it go out and hand us work on a plate. What is your point?

As for water, you on a meter cod? The day that went live our bill went down 50% and we are heavy users.  stop bullshining.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, big_cod said:

Corbyn punishing commuters what do think this government have been doing for years come on Chester’s sky high  train fares that hardly run on time mass overcrowding.Now how much were  you paying in the 70s for your train travel 10 bob and a conker .

Over £4billion to shareholders since 2010 that’s how much cash has been sucked out of the railways fares are now outstripping  peoples wages it’s wrong badly wrong and needs addressing .But you know what not a chance while this shower continue to govern rip the public off and give it to the wealthy nothing changes all the hype with Johnson it’s just waff and the sheep fell for it but his time will come that’s for certain.

Take water what a joke privatise water to give you choice ?? no privatise water to rip you off it’s a complete joke yep Yorkshire water ripping me off prices to high so I will change water providers to ........you’ve got it  Yorkshire water ? Only in Britain then there’s brexit any wonder the world is laughing at us .

 

Boris Johnson the man cannot lie straight in bed he is  a serial liar and all those labour voters who have got in bed with the devil will live to regret it .Mind you in 5 years time with brexit you probably won’t see the Tory’s for decades brexit is there baby and they will take full responsibility.

more bullshine from you, gonna commute from east London to Westminster today a fiver on the oyster card will do and that will be for both ways, might have to wait for a minute or perhaps another half on the platform. Do you travel in London. Even better, got a PRIVATE  car park to use, foc, not down to the e u I have to say.

Water you say, you on a meter?

how many times have you phoned offwat to complain about the cartel and the high price I have to ask?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
leedafeeder Member

leedafeeder

Posted
Posted

Even if our economy grows after leaving the EU,our standards will be in the gutter,alongside the USA and Australia's. But that's what 13.9 million people voted for when voting Conservative.

The implications are enormous..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
gozzer Member

gozzer

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, leedafeeder said:

Even if our economy grows after leaving the EU,our standards will be in the gutter,alongside the USA and Australia's. But that's what 13.9 million people voted for when voting Conservative.

The implications are enormous..

What standards are those, and what are the state of those ‘standards’ at present?                      

John.

Edited by gozzer

Angling is more than just catching fish, if it wasn't it would just be called 'catching'......... John

Link to comment
Share on other sites
big_cod Member

big_cod

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, barry luxton said:

Bad management, the e u are legendary for that one, why are they needed sport?

 

the e u didn't buy our home, nor did it pay the mortgage , nor did it force us up a 6 each morning for the daily grind to go to work. Nor did it go out and hand us work on a plate. What is your point?

As for water, you on a meter cod? The day that went live our bill went down 50% and we are heavy users.  stop bullshining.

50% cut in water rates with a water meter that’s a very bold statement one I find very hard to believe  unless you live in a 8 bedroom house and there is just you and your misses .

Now if everybody took up that 50% discount the water companies would go bankrupt.

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites
snakey1 Member

snakey1

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, leedafeeder said:

Even if our economy grows after leaving the EU,our standards will be in the gutter,alongside the USA and Australia's. But that's what 13.9 million people voted for when voting Conservative.

The implications are enormous..

well you could have always voted for corbyn and ended up with the standards of one of his favourite countries Venezuela, which are of course second to none :bigemo_harabe_net-163:

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
5 hours ago, leedafeeder said:

Even if our economy grows after leaving the EU,our standards will be in the gutter,alongside the USA and Australia's. But that's what 13.9 million people voted for when voting Conservative.

The implications are enormous..

infected chicken, e u = 50%

infected chicken usa = 13%

your point being?

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 hours ago, snakey1 said:

well you could have always voted for corbyn and ended up with the standards of one of his favourite countries Venezuela, which are of course second to none :bigemo_harabe_net-163:

Corbyn is busy  he has a funeral to go to, they are shovelling up the bits at the mo.  

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept