Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.


barry luxton

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38


Recommended Posts

No the bottom line is you don't half spout some shiite. The vote didn't go the way you liked and that's either because everyone who voted out was stupid and brainwashed, or it was some conspiracy controlled by the media ( I take it your beloved rag the mirror was above all this ) everyone one had the chance to vote. if a portion didn't bother that's their choice and so have no right to whine about the results after, and who knows a minority of them may have voted out as well it's equally likely as them voting in.

No the lshite was in the papers everyday and on our tv screens every day where is it now millons going to invade Britain why isn't on our tv screens now why 350 million going to NHS every week bullshit pure bullshut to influence the vote and yes it worked yet 1 day after the result over 1 million voters who voted out said they had made a mistake .

 

Quote of the week Boris Johnson said the brexit would be a Titanic success ? This is the man who screamed for brexit .

 

Not only that our unelected PM made him hiome secretary ?

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the bottom line is you don't half spout some shiite. The vote didn't go the way you liked and that's either because everyone who voted out was stupid and brainwashed, or it was some conspiracy controlled by the media ( I take it your beloved rag the mirror was above all this ) everyone one had the chance to vote. if a portion didn't bother that's their choice and so have no right to whine about the results after, and who knows a minority of them may have voted out as well it's equally likely as them voting in.

 

 

the mirror aka the Robert Maxwell is well below credibility today. What it has for the readers is that jessa will attempt to block, vote against triggering article 50 if he doesn't get his way on his demands. No matter how many voted leave democracy and the populist view is not something he subscribes to.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

the mirror aka the Robert Maxwell is well below credibility today. What it has for the readers is that jessa will attempt to block, vote against triggering article 50 if he doesn't get his way on his demands. No matter how many voted leave democracy and the populist view is not something he subscribes to.

Did the mirror ever have any credibility Barry? It's like the Sun, Star etc I wouldn't wrap chips in it.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No the lshite was in the papers everyday and on our tv screens every day where is it now millons going to invade Britain why isn't on our tv screens now why 350 million going to NHS every week bullshit pure bullshut to influence the vote and yes it worked yet 1 day after the result over 1 million voters who voted out said they had made a mistake .

From what I remember the TV seemed to be firmly bedded down on the remain side of things whilst the papers were split dependent on which rag you chose to read.

You still don't get it, plenty of lies.were told by both sides, they're politicians it what they do naturally like breathing.

I dont remember over 1 million leave voters being asked if they had made a mistake voting leave 1 day after the referendum. You wouldn't like to provide a link to these figures or are they just something you've made up like the over 30% who didn't vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Country VOTED OUT, get over it, simples :yawn:

  • Like 1

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I remember the TV seemed to be firmly bedded down on the remain side of things whilst the papers were split dependent on which rag you chose to read.

You still don't get it, plenty of lies.were told by both sides, they're politicians it what they do naturally like breathing.

I dont remember over 1 million leave voters being asked if they had made a mistake voting leave 1 day after the referendum. You wouldn't like to provide a link to these figures or are they just something you've made up like the over 30% who didn't vote.

 

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-eu-referendum-bregret-leave-petition-second-remain-latest-will-we-leave-a7105116.ht

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Did the mirror ever have any credibility Barry? It's like the Sun, Star etc I wouldn't wrap chips in it.

 

I like the star, the problem page lifts my day :nerd:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah so it was an opinion poll so you didn't make the figures up someone else did. so the real answer is no over 1 million people hadn't changed their minds but 7% of those asked by the poll (which was probably a couple of thousand at best) said they had and the rest is extrapolated boll ox. They also say that 696,000 remainers changed their minds and want to vote leave which is also an extrapolated figure and that remain would still have lost anyway. Sorry BC you'll have to try harder

Edited by snakey1
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.