E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

[corydoras]

It means "a one way thing", there would not be any 'free tickets' to allow the uncontrolled movement the other way, in reciprocation.

 

John.

Unless you happen to be Irish.

[gozzer]

Unless you happen to be Irish.

 

There may well have to be some kind of control on that border if it proves to be a problem.

 

John.

[Ken L]

Looks like the peoples of Bulgaria and Moldova have rejected the EU.

[Sportsman]

No cause for concern - yet

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37983948

 

This little nugget stands out

"The document also says big businesses could soon "point a gun at the government's head" to secure what they need to maintain jobs and investment.

It comes as Japanese car manufacturer Nissan said it was given "support and assurances" over trading conditions once Britain leaves the EU."

Edited November 15, 2016 by Sportsman

[gozzer]

No cause for concern - yet

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37983948

 

This little nugget stands out

"The document also says big businesses could soon "point a gun at the government's head" to secure what they need to maintain jobs and investment.

It comes as Japanese car manufacturer Nissan said it was given "support and assurances" over trading conditions once Britain leaves the EU."

 

Come on Dave, an unsigned 'leaked' memo, really?

It might or might not be true, but I would want a bit more detail on source, and motive, before I passed judgement.

 

John.

[Sportsman]

I know what you are saying John but sometimes these leaks tell more truth than the official release.

[big_cod]

Questions now being asked what sweetness did nisan receive to stop them pulling out of the uk the knoos is tightening how can they get sweeteners when other company's get non .

 

This government haven't got a strategy for brexit they haven't a clue what's lieing in wait mrs may could be history sooner than you think .

Edited November 16, 2016 by big_cod

[Huge_Vitae]

No cause for concern - yet

http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-37983948

 

This little nugget stands out

"The document also says big businesses could soon "point a gun at the government's head" to secure what they need to maintain jobs and investment.

It comes as Japanese car manufacturer Nissan said it was given "support and assurances" over trading conditions once Britain leaves the EU."

At the risk of repeating myself.

 

"They live life very vividly, and the stakes are very high if you don't have a lot of money to cushion your life. Also, because they're the front line of what we came to call the class war. Either through being workers without work, or through being exploited where they were working. And I guess for a political reason, because we felt, and I still think, that if there is to be change, it will come from below. It won't come from people who have a lot to lose, it will come from people who will have everything to gain."

[chesters1]

Questions now being asked what sweetness did nisan receive to stop them pulling out of the uk the knoos is tightening how can they get sweeteners when other company's get non .

 

This government haven't got a strategy for brexit they haven't a clue what's lieing in wait mrs may could be history sooner than you think .

Its doing what all governments have its called 'incentives' IE favourable tax concessions ,government handouts (sweeteners), favourable VAT manipulations ,paying the companies employee tax rates ,a 1001 and 1 fiddling in the background we cannot see ,its always done ,it always has been it always will be when big business rules the roost ,in return those 'favourable' to the companies get 'incentives' in return

Heres some speculation about TATA. ,labour would have done the same if in power and has in the past

http://uk.businessinsider.com/uk-government-incentives-for-buying-tata-steel-plants-2016-4

Most of its about keeping face ,thousands put on the dole isnt good for the governments prestige but forking out FAR more money than just paying them dole is not unusual

Labour were experts hiding dole figures by putting the long term in the disabled box and promoting 'training' schemes that helped no-one but the government because those in training are not on the dole or rather not listed as unemployed ,it ofcourse costs far more to hide them but its not the governments money is it so it was rife as is incentives to companies to stop their overpaid employees hitting the dole because without the handouts the companies would go elswhere

Edited November 16, 2016 by chesters1

[big_cod]

Its doing what all governments have its called 'incentives' IE favourable tax concessions ,government handouts (sweeteners), favourable VAT manipulations ,paying the companies employee tax rates ,a 1001 and 1 fiddling in the background we cannot see ,its always done ,it always has been it always will be when big business rules the roost ,in return those 'favourable' to the companies get 'incentives' in return

Heres some speculation about TATA. ,labour would have done the same if in power and has in the past

http://uk.businessinsider.com/uk-government-incentives-for-buying-tata-steel-plants-2016-4

Most of its about keeping face ,thousands put on the dole isnt good for the governments prestige but forking out FAR more money than just paying them dole is not unusual

Labour were experts hiding dole figures by putting the long term in the disabled box and promoting 'training' schemes that helped no-one but the government because those in training are not on the dole or rather not listed as unemployed ,it ofcourse costs far more to hide them but its not the governments money is it so it was rife as is incentives to companies to stop their overpaid employees hitting the dole because without the handouts the companies would go elswhere

Chesters company's have gone abroad for CHEAP LABOUR justlike as the states ford etc I love this bulkshit lets blame the workers no ever though greed bosses China is full of company's moved to cheap labour how can you compete with workers getting 10 bob week would you work for it how many families are below the poverty line in this country reallying on working tax credits child tax credits because if they weren't in place the queues from the employment offices would be down the street at least it gives people incentives to work and yes it was labour who introduced tax credits remember the 80ss under maggy I do very well no tax credits what was the song by ub40 I am a 1in 10 .