Jump to content

Will Donald trump last

big_cod

By big_cod
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Just reported, remember you heard it here folks.   Secret Service Agents responding to a call of suspicious behaviour have detained a male attempting to climb the Whitehouse Security Fence.   He h

*Ant*
*Ant*
Huge_Vitae
Huge_Vitae

Trumpy at Andrews giving his last speech as President, how many people would have predicted that five years ago. He still seems to be casting doubt on the legitimacy of the election despite so ma

Posted Images

corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

Sportsman,

 

It saddens me that 92% of republicans voted for Roy Moore.

 

Phone

"An early November poll found 29 percent of voters were more likely to vote for Moore after the revelations about his past."

 

https://www.vox.com/2017/12/12/16748868/alabama-senate-election-roy-moore-doug-jones-poll-times

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

Cory,

 

He beat Sen. Luther Strange (who resigned and was sinking in the mire of his own scandal) in the republican primary.

 

What was irritating to me was the number "92% of republicans". At best a loose estimate since Alabama is not a "branding iron" state (declare affiliation). Such headlines are simply intended to be divisive to create disagreement and hostility between people.

 

Sure Trump is a bum - but the media is wallowing in the same cesspool when citing extravagant numbers like "92%".

 

Sex with your sister is not a crime in Alabama

 

Phone

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted

Cory,

 

He beat Sen. Luther Strange (who resigned and was sinking in the mire of his own scandal) in the republican primary.

 

What was irritating to me was the number "92% of republicans". At best a loose estimate since Alabama is not a "branding iron" state (declare affiliation). Such headlines are simply intended to be divisive to create disagreement and hostility between people.

 

Sure Trump is a bum - but the media is wallowing in the same cesspool when citing extravagant numbers like "92%".

 

Sex with your sister is not a crime in Alabama

 

Phone

She doesn't live in Alabama and you havnt seen her
  • Like 1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted (edited)

Cory,

 

He beat Sen. Luther Strange (who resigned and was sinking in the mire of his own scandal) in the republican primary.

 

What was irritating to me was the number "92% of republicans". At best a loose estimate since Alabama is not a "branding iron" state (declare affiliation). Such headlines are simply intended to be divisive to create disagreement and hostility between people.

 

Sure Trump is a bum - but the media is wallowing in the same cesspool when citing extravagant numbers like "92%".

 

Sex with your sister is not a crime in Alabama

 

Phone

If you've been married three times but have always had the same in-laws, you might just be a red-neck. :-)

 

Sorry Phone but I had to run that through Google.

 

"(a) A person commits incest if he marries or engages in sexual intercourse with a person he knows to be, either legitimately or illegitimately:

© Incest is a Class C felony"

Edited by corydoras

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Phone Member

Phone

Posted
Posted

Cory,

 

Ahh-ha - class C felonies regarded as less serious than a misdemeanor in Alabama. Sort of like Barry's parking tickets. Class "C's" are a required badge to get into the University of Alabama.

 

Phone

P.S. There are slightly different interpretations of "C's" depending on race or national origin. Punishment can include life imprisonment.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted

Cory,

 

Ahh-ha - class C felonies regarded as less serious than a misdemeanor in Alabama. Sort of like Barry's parking tickets. Class "C's" are a required badge to get into the University of Alabama.

 

Phone

P.S. There are slightly different interpretations of "C's" depending on race or national origin. Punishment can include life imprisonment.

You are having us on Phone. BTW TOTEMIC = SYMBOLIC.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Phone, on 15 Dec 2017 - 02:30, said:

Cory,

 

Ahh-ha - class C felonies regarded as less serious than a misdemeanor in Alabama. Sort of like Barry's parking tickets. Class "C's" are a required badge to get into the University of Alabama.

 

Phone

P.S. There are slightly different interpretations of "C's" depending on race or national origin. Punishment can include life imprisonment.

 

 

That's very naughty of you phone, linking me with incest.

 

 

I don't have a sister.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

what a fab speech tump made tonight, anyone else see it. Liked the bit about claiming money back from those who have failed to keep their nato agreement subscriptions. You know who you are. :thumbs:

 

Dunno about how long will he last. It may well be the case he has earned another go, being the president for a second term.

 

And the wall is going to be built. :whistling:

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept