TRUMP COMING TO THE UK

[Phone 747]

Snakey,

 

I took it exactly as you intended. I was trying my best to "one upmanship" Chesters1. Really hard to do

 

Phone

[Phone 747]

Cory,

 

The Japanese to a large extent prefered the community concentration of internment for the most part (they were armed). Unlike Germans and Italians who "look" like us, the Japanese have unique physical characteristics. Some Chinese families also sought refuge near the Japanese camp. We were killing our own citizens randomly in an anacharcial manor. Doesn't excuse the event however.

 

BTW During World War II, thousands of Japanese, German and Italian prisoners of war were kept in internment camps at Camp Livingston in Mississippi.

 

In answer to Ken's question you'll remember I said between 5 and 20 million. The 20 million and maybe more died of non indigenous diseases in both North and South America.

 

Didn't the same diseases kill most of the "natives" in Australia? (I can't spell that word)

 

Phone

[Phone 747]

Ken,

 

Just an FYI

 

The Aztecs were well into the Central Plains of North America. They left prior to us "getting to them". Mass death by disease didn't get much West of the Rocky Mountains. We had to shoot those guys. (Actually, Western tribes assimilated much better than the "cowboy" Indians.

 

Phone

[corydoras 468]

Cory,

 

The Japanese to a large extent prefered the community concentration of internment for the most part (they were armed). Unlike Germans and Italians who "look" like us, the Japanese have unique physical characteristics. Some Chinese families also sought refuge near the Japanese camp. We were killing our own citizens randomly in an anacharcial manor. Doesn't excuse the event however.

 

BTW During World War II, thousands of Japanese, German and Italian prisoners of war were kept in internment camps at Camp Livingston in Mississippi.

 

In answer to Ken's question you'll remember I said between 5 and 20 million. The 20 million and maybe more died of non indigenous diseases in both North and South America.

 

Didn't the same diseases kill most of the "natives" in Australia? (I can't spell that word)

 

Phone

https://www.npr.org/sections/publiceditor/2012/02/10/146691773/euphemisms-concentration-camps-and-the-japanese-internment?t=1556240875501

[Phone 747]

Cory,

 

Yes, I like the part "In a climate of widespread fear bordering on panic ...,". The number you are looking for Cory is the number of civilians of Japanese descent who were murdered only because they were Japanese. What part of this are you not understanding?

 

Phone

[Andrew 505]

I blame the Romans, what have they ever done for us?

 

 

All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine, public order, irrigation, roads, the fresh-water system, and public health, what have the Romans ever done for us?

 

"Wait until Biggus Dickus hears of this!!!"

Edited April 26, 2019 by Andrew

[Ken L 983]

There are "lots of people" who think that a man died and came to life again after three days and there are lots of people who think that Mohammed flew up to heaven on a winged horse with the head of a woman. These days I see lots of people who think that the world is flat or that we did not go to the moon. Just because lots of people believe something does not mean that it is so.

Indeed, but unlike the story of the chappie who got nailed to a tree, we are stuck with the pesky definition....

[chesters1 1575]

Depends on how you determine belief aswell! Is he wrong? Hes moving without touching the ground lol

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wz8xEMylI8A

Can i believe agnosticism doesnt exist?

Why cant the unquestionable be questioned?

I am from missouri (wink)

Edited April 26, 2019 by chesters1

[Vagabond 1013]

what have the Romans ever done for us?

 

 

 

As well as the things you list, it is alleged they imported rabbits and nettles, which over the ages have helped quite a few country folk who would otherwise have been struggling on the breadline Boiled young nettle tops and rabbit pie - excellent fare.

[Huge_Vitae 556]

Shame it took them so long. Shame we still backed the Apartheid regime in South Africa.

On slavery yes, “WE” should have done it sooner, when do you suggest? Perhaps the Romans hundreds of years BC, well, don’t wish to use them again, so how about the Viking raiders seizing slaves from your native Scotland in 7th Century? Too long ago perhaps, so let’s go with the Irish indentured workers shipped to the Americas and Caribbean before the trade from the Barbary Coast became the main. Interesting that the ‘slave trade’ in the U.K. was outlawed well before the rest of the World where it still continues in some places to this day. Even better when you realise a husband could sell his wife at a cattle market after the abolition.

 

But hey, what do I know. You obviously had the solution to apartheid a long time ago so why didn’t you come forward?

 

You obviously had more idea than Harold Wilson, Edward Heath, Margaret Thatcher, Ronald Reagan et al. Perhaps you have use of a time machine to show you are right.