Jump to content

Bailing out the Euro

ColinW

By ColinW
in Non-Fishing Chat

 Share

Recommended Posts

captain cojones Member

captain cojones

Posted
Posted

Apparently its not true about the cat.

 

Considering all i seem to hear from UK residents is how the government walks all over them, and does what it likes without consideration to them......I think it would be madness to want to get rid of the human rights act, the only simple protection you have in law against government excesses that is available to all citizens....(or should i say subjects in the UK)

 

You don't even have a written constitution, just the act.

 

They need to sort out the judges that are incapable of interpreting it in the way it was intended. As ive said before, other countries don't have these problems, just yours. Its your judges. :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 271
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Posted Images

Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
Posted

LoL canny side step there. :D

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
barry luxton Member

barry luxton

Posted
Posted

Back on target, another one is heading for the dustbin. can we have a vote pretty please. regards, barry who enjoys basking in the uk's triple AAA rating re-confirmed yet again this week. Socialists please take note. :)

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-15176947

 

 

ohh, news just in, waitrose will be looking to employ a few thousand for it's new shops.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Andrew Member

Andrew

Posted
Posted

More bail out money to be paid looms ?

 

Our resident experts will surely know , wont they !

"La conclusión es que los insultos sólo perjudican cuando vienen de alguien que respeto". e5006689.gif

“Vescere bracis meis”

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Steve Walker Member

Steve Walker

Posted
Posted

On the cat thing - he wasn't allowed to stay because he had a cat, he was allowed to stay because he was in a long term relationship with a British woman, and the fact that they had taken on a pet together was used as contributing evidence of the relationship.

 

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/reality...P=ILCNETTXT3487

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Sportsman Member

Sportsman

Posted
Posted

A point of view that some may agree with

 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15155395

Let's agree to respect each others views, no matter how wrong yours may be.

 

 

Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity

 

 

 

http://www.safetypublishing.co.uk/
http://www.safetypublishing.ie/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
chesters1 Member

chesters1

Posted
Posted (edited)

the cat was the deciding factor wasn't it ,we haven't a cat thus me and the mrs married 37 years today are not a family <_<

why get married or have a civil wedding just get a cat ,hmmmm are old ladies with 27 moggies serial bigamists :o

 

the right to family is one of the first bits i would tear up ,what next the cat with the right to have one?

Edited by chesters1

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites
captain cojones Member

captain cojones

Posted
Posted
the cat was the deciding factor wasn't it ,we haven't a cat thus me and the mrs married 37 years today are not a family <_<

why get married or have a civil wedding just get a cat ,hmmmm are old ladies with 27 moggies serial bigamists :o

 

the right to family is one of the first bits i would tear up ,what next the cat with the right to have one?

 

Your judges Chester. Thats what needs "tearing up" not the act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
corydoras Member

corydoras

Posted
Posted
the cat was the deciding factor wasn't it
No it was not.

 

the right to family is one of the first bits i would tear up ,what next the cat with the right to have one?
So you would happily rescind your right to a family life?

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.

  I accept