Another mass murder

[robtherake]

When employees are paid wages so low they are on the breadline i have no doubt they spit in food without any reason what so ever

And as so many are foreign its probably natural to do so

 

There's an urban legend that does the rounds about an interesting and creamy addition to the mayo in a burger from a popular chain that gave a lady herpes. Probably urban myth, but who knows?

A guy I know worked as a chef in a hotel chain. If he's to be believed (and I've always found him to be a straight-up guy) when anyone complained about a steak they'd p!ss on it, grill it for a bit longer and send it back out.

[chesters1]

There's an urban legend that does the rounds about an interesting and creamy addition to the mayo in a burger from a popular chain that gave a lady herpes. Probably urban myth, but who knows?

A guy I know worked as a chef in a hotel chain. If he's to be believed (and I've always found him to be a straight-up guy) when anyone complained about a steak they'd p!ss on it, grill it for a bit longer and send it back out.

 

going by the vids of similar antics on youtube i have no doubt hes correct ,i never eat out i get my phloem from processed food and when i upset the mrs

 

i remember visiting a child abundant friend of the mrs once on drinking a mug of tea on the opposite side from my mouth on getting to 2/3rds down was an unmistakable bogey ,from then on i never drink out either unless politeness forces me to

Edited December 24, 2012 by chesters1

[barry luxton]

as an aside to 'p'ssey pizzas, just nicked it off facebook, well i think it's funny:

He was being cross-examined by a defense attorney during a felony trial. The lawyer was trying to undermine the police officer's credibility .....

 

Q: 'Officer --- did you see my client fleeing the scene?'

 

A: 'No sir. But I subsequently observed a person matching the description of the offender, running several blocks away.'

 

Q: 'Officer, who provided this description?'

 

A: 'The officer who responded to the scene.'

 

Q: 'A fellow officer provided the description of this so-called offender. Do you trust your fellow officers?'

 

A: 'Yes, sir. With my life.'

 

Q: 'With your life? Let me ask you this then officer. Do you have a room where you change your clothes in preparation for your daily duties?'

 

A: 'Yes sir, we do!'

 

Q: 'And do you have a locker in the room?'

 

A: 'Yes, sir, I do.'

 

Q: 'And do you have a lock on your locker?'

 

A: 'Yes, sir.'

 

Q: 'Now, why is it, officer, if you trust your fellow officers with your life, you find it necessary to lock your locker in a room you share with these same officers?'

 

A: 'You see, sir, we share the building with the court complex, and sometimes lawyers have been known to walk through that room.'

 

The courtroom EXPLODED with laughter, and a prompt recess was called. The officer on the stand has been nominated for this year's 'Best Comeback' line -- and we think he'll win.

[snakey1]

 

bransons perspective,

heres another figure he can add to the list

number of people killed by motor vehicles in the USA 2011: 32,367

[Old geezer]

So the answer is to ban motor vehicles worldwide?

 

Yeah right......

[snakey1]

So the answer is to ban motor vehicles worldwide?

 

Yeah right......

If people are really bothered about saving lives then yes and while we're at it alcohol (depending upon source alcohol related deaths in the USA have topped 75,000 a year) & tobacco (according to the CDC more deaths are caused each year by tobacco use than by all deaths from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), illegal drug use, alcohol use, motor vehicle injuries, suicides, and murders combined, approx 450,000) are another two items that should be banned as well.

Edited December 24, 2012 by snakey1

[Phone]

Geezer,

 

I can't get it through you thick head. It is about a likely for one to happen as the other. Ban cars or ban guns. Neither will happen. Frankly, we need an intelligent dialogue to reduce if not solve both problems. DON'T think ban - think limitations that would make a meaningful difference.

 

We have more guns than we have cars. We AIN'T givin' em' up!! Bark all you want - That is not a viable solution.

 

Phone

Snakey, I hate stats like you cited. It assumes, otherwise, we would not die without "cause".

Edited December 24, 2012 by Phone

[Old geezer]

Phone,

 

I'll just have to try and get it through YOUR thick head.......

 

I agree with you

[snakey1]

Geezer,

 

I can't get it through you thick head. It is about a likely for one to happen as the other. Ban cars or ban guns. Neither will happen. Frankly, we need an intelligent dialogue to reduce if not solve both problems. DON'T think ban - think limitations that would make a meaningful difference.

 

We have more guns than we have cars. We AIN'T givin' em' up!! Bark all you want - That is not a viable solution.

 

Phone

Snakey, I hate stats like you cited. It assumes, otherwise, we would not die without "cause".

I can't say I like stats myself as they never give a true representation of the facts and can be made to suit anyones point of view, but while the "Ban firearms" people are happy to use them in a simplistic manner then I'm happy to return the favour.

[ayjay]

Geezer,

 

DON'T think ban - think limitations that would make a meaningful difference.

 

We have more guns than we have cars. We AIN'T givin' em' up!! Bark all you want - That is not a viable solution.

 

OK then, lets ban the ammo!

 

Why will you not give up your guns? Do you have one? What do you do with it? When did you last use it? Help me understand - I've never owned one or wanted to own one.

 

Why does the NRA, with a membership of 4-5 million, (and sadly rising @ 8000 per day since Sandy Hook) have so much influence in a country with a population of 314 million?