Madeleine

[Cranfield]

A friend who has just returned from his regular holiday to Spain has told me that the big difference he noticed this year, was that during the evening the adults seemed to have all their children with them.

He said he has never seen so many prams and pushchairs etc., in the restaurants/cafes.

 

Perhaps something good may still come out of all of this.

[billy50000]

apparently kates friends have gone to london to speak in her defence....

 

but we all know that things are very differant behind closed doors!!!!

 

she(kate) doesnt strike me as a strong women and in my opinion HE has the trousers(like in many relationships FACT!!!)(domestic violence helpline/batter`d women blar blar blar

 

im not saying all blokes are like it(pushy/arogant/maybe even abusive(mentally & physically)but it DOES happen FACT!!

 

all im trying to say is the friends dont have any idea what happens behind closed doors!!

 

and kates diary apparently states that GERRY is crap around the house and with the kids!

 

its all abit of a sorry state when a friend has to come out to spout some words to the effect of("thats my mate leave her alone or else")

Edited September 16, 2007 by billy50000

[captain cojones]

http://b3ta.com/links/Gerry_McCann_intervi...about_sedatives

 

The above is a short video clip of part of an interview with the Mccanns. Interesting, especially for people like me who take special notice of body language,during interviews.

i was interested in his comment that they had cooperated fully with the police,when he had actually refused to answer 40 questions in his last formal interview.

[billy50000]

no doubt a body language specialist could have a field day with that interview....

 

my opinion is he is a nervous as hell and id love to see a poly test done!!!!!

 

and as usual kate is silent!!?

 

i mean` the word is they drugged the kids!!! and kates says nothing in her defence!!!!!!!id be livid

Edited September 16, 2007 by billy50000

[barry luxton]

The above is a short video clip of part of an interview with the Mccanns. Interesting, especially for people like me who take special notice of body language,during interviews.

i was interested in his comment that they had cooperated fully with the police,when he had actually refused to answer 40 questions in his last formal interview.

 

Is it not true that if you was being followed by a cop car for a few miles, what you don't want to do is reach and keep scratching your ear or head as the copper would think you are nervous about something. thats what i always thought.

[kleinboet]

I have a question - I am going to post it and I am going to leave you to ponder it for a while.

I fully expect the pro-McCanns to come back and rubbish it, but it is so off beat and horrible to think of, it MUST be thought about:

 

 

If Kate and Gerry ARE charged - after all the WORLDWIDE publicity this case has had - where are they going to find a trial jury?

[barry luxton]

I have a question - I am going to post it and I am going to leave you to ponder it for a while.

I fully expect the pro-McCanns to come back and rubbish it, but it is so off beat and horrible to think of, it MUST be thought about:

If Kate and Gerry ARE charged - after all the WORLDWIDE publicity this case has had - where are they going to find a trial jury?

 

They found one for o j and m j

Edited September 16, 2007 by barry luxton

[ColinW]

HV, what makes you think I want this thread closed? If you want to show yourself as a nasty, bullying, self important prat, why should I care? Like I said, I don't know you, but I feel I'm getting a better picture.

Keep going, you are doing a much better job of discrediting some of the ludicrous statements in this thread than I ever could.

 

To get back on thread I'll remind you that all I have said about the McCann case is that since none of us (including those with an apparent sixth sense about such things) have any information or evidence about what happened to the unfortunate girl, we should say nothing. That does not seem a particularly extreme point of view to me.

[gozzer]

To get back on thread I'll remind you that all I have said about the McCann case is that since none of us (including those with an apparent sixth sense about such things) have any information or evidence about what happened to the unfortunate girl, we should say nothing. That does not seem a particularly extreme point of view to me.

 

Colin, I have refrained from speculating on this case, other than saying that I have a 'gut feeling' that something, just didn't 'sit easy' with me from the first time I heard about it.

 

The one thing that does bother me is the media exposure that the parents have encouraged.

This may be to keep the child's image in the public eye, and hope to ensure her release, but to my mind it would have the opposite effect, and seal the child's fate at the hands of any abductor, leaving the person nowhere to go.

Such a large publicity campaign is bound to cause speculation among the public, and some of that is going to be negative.

They put the whole case to the world, and are now reaping the results of that publicity.

 

I have my own thoughts on the case, some of which I don't want to believe as possible, I think that is the situation most people are in.

 

John.

[captain cojones]

I have a question - I am going to post it and I am going to leave you to ponder it for a while.

I fully expect the pro-McCanns to come back and rubbish it, but it is so off beat and horrible to think of, it MUST be thought about:

If Kate and Gerry ARE charged - after all the WORLDWIDE publicity this case has had - where are they going to find a trial jury?

 

they wont need to look for a jury.....there isnt one.

they would come to trial in portugal, which has normally a panel of judges which sit to consider the case.

in my opinion a much better system,as they have heard it all before, and are not confused by sometimes,complicated evidence issues.

Edited September 16, 2007 by captain cojones