E U. Should we stay or should we leave.

[barry luxton]

here we go, the inners have been sneeringly telling all the brexiters don't have a clue what will happen and it's a leap in the dark yawn, yet this tells all that the brexiters do understand. Absolutely no difference to Cameron and co saying could be would be so the inners can go do one as far as I'm concerned. Still waiting for them to justify the benefit of the c a p and the c f p. None of them have to date. Ohh and the e u is cutting the funding to science and innovation, running out of tax payers money again? o k to pay the likes of tate and lyle half a billion for doing nothing though

 

 

Vote Leave said farming subsidies could be protected if the UK quits the EU

 

Ministers campaigning to leave the European Union say recipients of EU funding would get the same money if the UK votes to leave.

 

EU funding projects for areas including farming, science, and culture would be continued until 2020, they said.

 

They said the payments could be made more efficiently, allowing for more cash for priorities such as the NHS.

 

But Remain campaigners said leaving the EU would "wreck Britain's economy" and trigger public spending cuts.

 

BBC political correspondent Ben Wright said Vote Leave's open letter, signed by ex-London mayor Boris Johnson and ministers including Michael Gove and Priti Patel, sounded like "a pledge of a government in waiting".

 

 

Vote Leave has no power to make public spending promises - but is trying to reassure recipients of EU money their funding would be safe, he added.

Edited June 14, 2016 by barry luxton

[Sportsman]

Vote Leave has no power to make public spending promises

But they will anyway.

So, if you leave the EU they will continue to give you funding, honest.

[gozzer]

Not as if it's an important decision, is it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-british-public-wrong-about-nearly-everything-survey-shows-a7074311.html

 

That's not surprising Dave, the whole thing has been 'sold' on half truths and lies from the very beginning.

 

John.

[Sportsman]

Agree entirely John

On both sides.

[corydoras]

Not as if it's an important decision, is it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-british-public-wrong-about-nearly-everything-survey-shows-a7074311.html

Some aren't even wrong.

[corydoras]

here we go, the inners have been sneeringly telling all the brexiters don't have a clue what will happen and it's a leap in the dark yawn, yet this tells all that the brexiters do understand. Absolutely no difference to Cameron and co saying could be would be so the inners can go do one as far as I'm concerned. Still waiting for them to justify the benefit of the c a p and the c f p. None of them have to date. Ohh and the e u is cutting the funding to science and innovation, running out of tax payers money again? o k to pay the likes of tate and lyle half a billion for doing nothing though

 

 

Vote Leave said farming subsidies could be protected if the UK quits the EU

 

Ministers campaigning to leave the European Union say recipients of EU funding would get the same money if the UK votes to leave.

 

EU funding projects for areas including farming, science, and culture would be continued until 2020, they said.

 

They said the payments could be made more efficiently, allowing for more cash for priorities such as the NHS.

 

But Remain campaigners said leaving the EU would "wreck Britain's economy" and trigger public spending cuts.

 

BBC political correspondent Ben Wright said Vote Leave's open letter, signed by ex-London mayor Boris Johnson and ministers including Michael Gove and Priti Patel, sounded like "a pledge of a government in waiting".

 

 

Vote Leave has no power to make public spending promises - but is trying to reassure recipients of EU money their funding would be safe, he added.

I thought you did not set much store in "could be" and "maybe"?

[chesters1]

Not as if it's an important decision, is it?

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/eu-referendum-british-public-wrong-about-nearly-everything-survey-shows-a7074311.html

Its a moot point ,ask in london the white british in 2011 were 44%

Its so easy manipulating statistics they should be barred from any sensible conversations

 

What next decisions made on 55% of 1 ?

Edited June 14, 2016 by chesters1

[corydoras]

Its a moot point ,ask in london the white british in 2011 were 44%

Its so easy manipulating statistics they should be barred from any sensible conversations

 

What next decisions made on 55% of 1 ?

Ask who, in what part on London?

[chesters1]

Ask who, in what part on London?

You see my point ,london not hammersmith or deptford or ealing

Or england not surrey or kent or yorkshire

Its called a whole not a section ,its possible to find a place never seeing a foreigner their outlook would be far different to golders green or some pakistani ghetto

 

Statistics are useless ,stand outside harrods and ask passers bye if they shop in harrods then in the exact same spot only ask those leaving harrods and then only ask those with harrods bags and the results will be vastly different

You could truthfully say 100% of those questioned shopped in harrods ,we may know the question but nothing about how its asked

Edited June 14, 2016 by chesters1

[corydoras]

You see my point ,london not hammersmith or deptford or ealing

Or england not surrey or kent or yorkshire

Its called a whole not a section ,its possible to find a place never seeing a foreigner their outlook would be far different to golders green or some pakistani ghetto

 

Statistics are useless ,stand outside harrods and ask passers bye if they shop in harrods then in the exact same spot only ask those leaving harrods and then only ask those with harrods bags and the results will be vastly different

You could truthfully say 100% of those questioned shopped in harrods ,we may know the question but nothing about how its asked

Statistics are useless, says the man on the keyboard attached to a computer on the end of an ADSL line, all of which rely on statistics.