Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.


barry luxton

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38


Recommended Posts

Immigration was the scare Steve for brexit where are we now Calais is being disembled as we speak it was rammed down people's throats day In Day out the public were mislead the pound is shocking as I know being here in Portugal .

I think you might like to know that a small element of truth was omitted from the Guardian when they published the 'secret' 'leaked' audio tapes and that is the conversation was held BEFORE the referendum when the Wicked Witch of the South was campaigning, admittedly not very vocally for Remain.

 

I would suggest that a few people would benefit from reading the recent writings of Ken Loach, film producer and life long socialist concerning information presented to the public on a multitude of subjects by the various news media.

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Teresa Mays tape recording it's just shows unbelievable !!!!!

 

This woman is clearly not fit for office she has clearly deceived the British people and now as PM .

 

It's worse than watergate .

 

https://www.google.co.uk/amp/s/amp.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/25/exclusive-leaked-recording-shows-what-theresa-may-really-thinks-about-brexit

 

 

Wait for it !!!!!!!!!!!!

 

I say a 2nd referendum should be called the out would ?hit themselves it would be then a massive in .?

Edited by big_cod

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

She's never been pro-Brexit, she said the same things that the rest of the leave side was saying. I don't see what you're getting excited about. She was for remain, she spoke at a meeting in favour of remain, her side lost, she is tasked with doing what the country voted for and means to do her duty whether she agrees with it or not.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Immigration was the scare Steve for brexit where are we now Calais is being disembled as we speak it was rammed down people's throats day In Day out the public were mislead the pound is shocking as I know being here in Portugal .

Yes. The Brexit camp talked about immigration. The Remain camp talked about the economy. What May said to Goldman Sachs is exactly what the Leave camp was telling the public. The public didn't care.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes. The Brexit camp talked about immigration. The Remain camp talked about the economy. What May said to Goldman Sachs is exactly what the Leave camp was telling the public. The public didn't care.

Why was that Steve because they were brainwashed .

http://sea-otter2.co.uk/

Probably Whitby's most consistent charterboat

Untitled-1.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was that Steve because they were brainwashed .

No, I don't think so. The immigration argument was pushing an open door. The economic one seemed more remote to people's daily lives. It was something people were already moaning about versus something that they were being told by "experts" might happen.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was that Steve because they were brainwashed .

Yeah everyone was brainwashed who voted out because they obviously couldn't possibly have made up their own minds, 17 million people brainwashed that's pretty impressive or would be if it wasn't a pile of BS

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why was that Steve because they were brainwashed .

Your way to genorous mate. You're implying they have brains to wash.

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wasnt brainwashed either way just sat on the fence watching everyone getting more and more excited when the **** hit the fan .laughed when no one wanted to hold that hot spud

  • Like 1

Number me with Rage it,s a shame Number me in Haste its a shame

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Your way to genorous mate. You're implying they have brains to wash.

 

 

ohhh dear

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.