Jump to content

E U. Should we stay or should we leave.


barry luxton

BREXIT in or out  

52 members have voted

  1. 1. should the u k remain in or leave the E U

    • vote to stay in
      12
    • vote to stay in following e u rule change
      2
    • vote to leave
      38


Recommended Posts

Thought better of you than reposting scaremongering like that Cory.

 

 

Totally agree. thought Osborne was bad.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree. thought Osborne was bad.

Really? Did you actually read it? Wanna answer any of them questions:

 

Why is it scaremongering? Is it true or is it false.?

 

Is it my fault that all the tw@ts that have been clamouring for this self harm have not thought it through? Do you know how many countries we have FTAs with because we are in the EU? How long do you think it will take to negotiate them all again from scratch?

 

No you won't, you don't answer questions do you?

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem isn't what people don't know, it's what they know that just ain't so.
Vaut mieux ne rien dire et passer pour un con que de parler et prouver que t'en est un!
Mi, ch’fais toudis à m’mote

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hugh,

 

Regarding BREXIT and my current inquires. It comes down to this:

 

''''Whenever anything extraordinary is done in American municipal politics, whether for good or for evil, you can trace it almost invariably to one man. The people do not do it. Neither do the 'gangs,' 'combines,' or political parties."""""

 

WHO IS THAT PERSON IN THE UK?

 

Phone

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lincoln Steffens

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why is it scaremongering? Is it true or is it false.?

 

Is it my fault that all the tw@ts that have been clamouring for this self harm have not thought it through? Do you know how many countries we have FTAs with because we are in the EU? How long do you think it will take to negotiate them all again from scratch?

 

At least I post links to proper grown-ups newspapers and not from the effing Blue Rinse Beano Daily Express like Barry "Hurricane"Luxton.

I didn't say it was true or false, the tariff you quote is for 'immediate packaging' sizes; skimmed milk, >2ltrs; Butter >2.5kgs. So it is false to infer that standard packs of butter or milk attract such a tariff. I very rarely pop down to the shops for a 3kg pack of butter or a gallon bottle of milk!

 

It is also rather ambiguous to chose dairy products in any example of trade between EU and UK. Simply because, although the UK is a net importer of Cheese and Butter and a net exporter of milk, a substantial amount of that trade is milk going to Ireland (export) that is then processed into Butter and Cheese before being returned to UK for retail sale. (Import). I would imagine that a tariff imposed on tankers of milk at the rate quoted thus raising the price of butter returned would have any other impact than the UK milk being diverted to UK processors such as that famous brand of New Zealand butter, Anchor, which of course comes from far away Wiltshire resulting without any shadow of a doubt to the loss of employment in Ireland and an increase in UK employment.

 

I can find and produce for you a report on the Brexit effects produced for the Dairy Industry should you wish to see it.

 

On the new point you raise, can I ask you why the UK would wish to negotiate new trading agreements, which would take time, with any other trading partner than the EU bloc.

 

Newspapers do not sell facts, they sell headlines based on assumptions, rumour and opinion. Very often saying something is fact because it has been reported in other media.

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hugh,

 

Regarding BREXIT and my current inquires. It comes down to this:

 

 

 

WHO IS THAT PERSON IN THE UK?

 

Phone

 

 

Careful Phone, McCarthy is alive and well living in angler's net.

"My imaginary friend doesn't like your imaginary friend is no basis for armed conflict...."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Careful Phone, McCarthy is alive and well living in angler's net.

No reds under my bed but Cod should check lol

Believe NOTHING anyones says or writes unless you witness it yourself and even then your eyes can deceive you

None of this "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" crap it just means i have at least two enemies!

 

There is only one opinion i listen to ,its mine and its ALWAYS right even when its wrong

 

Its far easier to curse the darkness than light one candle

 

Mathew 4:19

Grangers law : anything i say will  turn out the opposite or not happen at all!

Life insurance? you wont enjoy a penny!

"To compel a man to furnish contributions of money for the propagation of opinions which he disbelieves and abhors, is sinful and tyrannical." Thomas Jefferson

Link to comment
Share on other sites

big_cod, on 18 Nov 2017 - 00:22, said:

Are we going to be poorer with brexit course we are .

 

 

https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/nov/17/frankfurt-brexit-germany-uk-eu

 

So are the europeon countries if the e u manderins fail to negotiate in a manner fit to serve their electorate as apposed to political posturing.

Free to choose apart from the ones where the trust poked their nose in. Common eel. tope. Bass and sea bream. All restricted.


New for 2016 TAT are the main instigators for the demise of the u k bass charter boat industry, where they went screaming off to parliament and for the first time assisting so called angling gurus set up bass take bans with the e u using rubbish exaggerated info collected by ices from anglers, they must be very proud.

Upgrade, the door has been closed with regards to anglers being linked to the e u superstate and the failed c f p. So TAT will no longer need to pay monies to the EAA anymore as that org is no longer relevant to the u k . Goodbye to the europeon anglers alliance and pathetic restrictions from the e u.

Angling is better than politics, ban politics from angling.

Consumer of bass. where is the evidence that the u k bass stock need angling trust protection. Why won't you work with your peers instead of castigating them. They have the answer.

Recipie's for mullet stew more than welcomed.

Angling sanitation trust and kent and sussex sea anglers org delete's and blocks rsa's alternative opinion on their face book site. Although they claim to rep all.

new for 2014. where is the evidence that the south coast bream stock need the angling trust? Your campaign has no evidence. Why won't you work with your peers, the inshore under tens? As opposed to alienating them? Angling trust failed big time re bait digging, even fish legal attempted to intervene and failed, all for what, nothing.

Looks like the sea angling reps have been coerced by the ifca's to compose sea angling strategy's that the ifca's at some stage will look at drafting into legislation to manage the rsa, because they like wasting tax payers money. That's without asking the rsa btw. You know who you are..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We and our partners use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences, repeat visits and to show you personalised advertisements. By clicking “I Agree”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit Cookie Settings to provide a controlled consent.